» Articles » PMID: 35517111

Effect of Micro-aerobic Process on Improvement of Anaerobic Digestion Sewage Sludge Treatment: Flow Cytometry and ATP Assessment

Overview
Journal RSC Adv
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35517111
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Micro-aeration as a pretreatment method improves the efficiency of anaerobic digestion of municipal sewage sludge and consequently promotes the methane production. In this study, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and flow cytometry (FCM) were employed to monitor the performance of the micro-aerobic process and investigate the survival of bacterial cells within the process. At first, the effect of air flow rate (AFR) (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 vvm) on hydrolysis of mixed sludge in 5 aeration cycles (20, 30, 40, 48 and 60 hours) was examined. Then, the effects of the micro aerobic process on methane (CH) production in anaerobic digestion were surveyed. The highest VSS reduction was 30.6% and 10.4% for 40 hours in the reactor and control, respectively. Soluble COD also fluctuated between 40.87 and 65.14% in micro-aerobic conditions; the highest SCOD was achieved at the time of 40 h. Microbial activities were increased by 597%, 170% and 79.4% for 20, 30 and 40 h pretreatment with the micro-aerobic process, respectively. Apoptosis assay showed that micro-aerobic pre-treatment at 20, 30 and 40 h increased the percentage of living cells by 57.4, 62.8 and 67.9%, respectively. On the other hand, FCM results showed that the highest percentage of viable bacteria (, 67.9%) was observed at 40 h pretreating which was approximately 40% higher the ones for the control. Variation in cumulative methane production shows that methane production was increased by 221% compared to anaerobic digestion (control group). Therefore, ATP and FCM can be employed as two appropriate, accurate, relatively specific indicators for monitoring the process and bacteria viability.

Citing Articles

The Similarities in Microbial and Chemical Patterns of Fermentation in Two Open Environments were Promoted by Using 150-Year-Old Nukadoko as Starters.

Yamaguchi M, Imai K, Chen D, Seong Y, Jo K, Ito K Curr Microbiol. 2024; 81(8):250.

PMID: 38951184 PMC: 11217091. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-024-03760-3.


The influence of combined low-strength ultrasonics and micro-aerobic pretreatment process on methane generation and sludge digestion: Lipase enzyme, microbial activation, and energy yield.

Rashvanlou R, Farzadkia M, Rezaee A, Gholami M, Kermani M, Pasalari H Ultrason Sonochem. 2021; 73:105531.

PMID: 33799109 PMC: 8044681. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105531.

References
1.
Sawatdeenarunat C, Sung S, Khanal S . Enhanced volatile fatty acids production during anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass via micro-oxygenation. Bioresour Technol. 2017; 237:139-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.029. View

2.
Yang Y, Lu Y, Wu Q, Hu H, Chen Y, Liu W . Evidence of ATP assay as an appropriate alternative of MTT assay for cytotoxicity of secondary effluents from WWTPs. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015; 122:490-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.09.006. View

3.
Kinet R, Dzaomuho P, Baert J, Taminiau B, Daube G, Nezer C . Flow cytometry community fingerprinting and amplicon sequencing for the assessment of landfill leachate cellulolytic bioaugmentation. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 214:450-459. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.131. View

4.
Xiao K, Zhou Y, Guo C, Maspolim Y, Ng W . Dynamics of propionic acid degradation in a two-phase anaerobic system. Chemosphere. 2014; 140:47-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.004. View

5.
Abzazou T, Salvado H, Bruguera-Casamada C, Simon P, Lardin C, Araujo R . Assessment of total bacterial cells in extended aeration activated sludge plants using flow cytometry as a microbial monitoring tool. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015; 22(15):11446-55. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4372-3. View