» Articles » PMID: 35508959

Long-Term Management of Seizures After Surgical Treatment of Supratentorial Cavernous Malformations : A Retrospective Single Centre Study

Overview
Date 2022 May 5
PMID 35508959
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Seizure recurrence after the first-ever seizure in patients with a supratentorial cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is almost certain, so the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy is justified. The optimal method of management of these patients is still a matter of debate. The aim of our study was to identify factors associated with postoperative seizure control and assess the surgical morbidity rate.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 45 consecutive patients with a supratentorial CCM and symptomatic epilepsy in a single centre. Pre- and postoperative epidemiological data, seizure-related patient histories, neuroimaging results, surgery details and outcomes were obtained from hospital medical records. Seizure outcomes were assessed at least 12 months after surgery.

Results: Thirty-five patients (77.8%) were seizure free at the long-term follow-up (Engel class I); six (13,3%) had rare, nocturnal seizures (Engel class II); and four (8.9%) showed meaningful improvement (Engel class III). In 15 patients (33%) in the Engel I group; it was possible to discontinue antiepileptic medication. Although there was not statistical significance, our results suggest that patients can benefit from early surgery. No deaths occurred in our study, and mild postoperative neurologic deficits were observed in two patients (4%) at the long-term follow-up.

Conclusion: Surgical resection of CCMs should be considered in all patients with a supratentorial malformation and epilepsy due to the favourable surgical results in terms of the epileptic seizure control rate and low postoperative morbidity risk, despite the use of different predictors for the seizure outcome.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Relationship between Surgical Timing and Postoperative Seizure Outcomes in Cavernoma-Related Epilepsy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis of 63 Patients with a Review of the Literature.

Nico E, Adereti C, Hackett A, Bianconi A, Naik A, Eberle A Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790473 PMC: 11120247. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050494.

References
1.
Sanmillan J, Lopez-Ojeda P, Fernandez-Conejero I, Fernandez-Coello A, Plans G, Ali-Ciurana Y . Treatment of cavernous malformations in supratentorial eloquent areas: experience after 10 years of patient-tailored surgical protocol. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018; 160(10):1963-1974. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-018-3644-3. View

2.
Dziedzic T, Kunert P, Matyja E, Ziora-Jakutowicz K, Sidoti A, Marchel A . Familial cerebral cavernous malformation. Folia Neuropathol. 2012; 50(2):152-8. View

3.
Kivelev J, Niemela M, Blomstedt G, Roivainen R, Lehecka M, Hernesniemi J . Microsurgical treatment of temporal lobe cavernomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010; 153(2):261-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-010-0812-5. View

4.
von der Brelie C, Malter M, Niehusmann P, Elger C, von Lehe M, Schramm J . Surgical management and long-term seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery for different types of epilepsy associated with cerebral cavernous malformations. Epilepsia. 2013; 54(9):1699-706. DOI: 10.1111/epi.12327. View

5.
Hammen T, Romstock J, Dorfler A, Kerling F, Buchfelder M, Stefan H . Prediction of postoperative outcome with special respect to removal of hemosiderin fringe: a study in patients with cavernous haemangiomas associated with symptomatic epilepsy. Seizure. 2007; 16(3):248-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.01.001. View