» Articles » PMID: 35505880

Capturing Indirect Genetic Effects on Phenotypic Variability: Competition Meets Canalization

Overview
Journal Evol Appl
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 May 4
PMID 35505880
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Phenotypic variability of a genotype is relevant both in natural and domestic populations. In the past two decades, variability has been studied as a heritable quantitative genetic trait in its own right, often referred to as inherited variability or environmental canalization. So far, studies on inherited variability have only considered genetic effects of the focal individual, that is, direct genetic effects on inherited variability. Observations from aquaculture populations and some plants, however, suggest that an additional source of genetic variation in inherited variability may be generated through competition. Social interactions, such as competition, are often a source of Indirect Genetic Effects (IGE). An IGE is a heritable effect of an individual on the trait value of another individual. IGEs may substantially affect heritable variation underlying the trait, and the direction and magnitude of response to selection. To understand the contribution of IGEs to evolution of environmental canalization in natural populations, and to exploit such inherited variability in animal and plant breeding, we need statistical models to capture this effect. To our knowledge, it is unknown to what extent the current statistical models commonly used for IGE and inherited variability capture the effect of competition on inherited variability. Here, we investigate the potential of current statistical models for inherited variability and trait values, to capture the direct and indirect genetic effects of competition on variability. Our results show that a direct model of inherited variability almost entirely captures the genetic sensitivity of individuals to competition, whereas an indirect model of inherited variability captures the cooperative genetic effects of individuals on their partners. Models for trait levels, however, capture only a small part of the genetic effects of competition. The estimation of direct and indirect genetic effects of competition, therefore, is possible with models for inherited variability but may require a two-step analysis.

Citing Articles

Genomic prediction for root and yield traits of barley under a water availability gradient: a case study comparing different spatial adjustments.

Tessema B, Raffo M, Guo X, Svane S, Krusell L, Jensen J Plant Methods. 2024; 20(1):8.

PMID: 38216953 PMC: 10785381. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-023-01121-y.


Importance of interindividual interactions in eco-evolutionary population dynamics: The rise of demo-genetic agent-based models.

Lamarins A, Fririon V, Folio D, Vernier C, Daupagne L, Labonne J Evol Appl. 2022; 15(12):1988-2001.

PMID: 36540635 PMC: 9753837. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13508.


Genomics applied to livestock and aquaculture breeding.

Yanez J, Xu P, Carvalheiro R, Hayes B Evol Appl. 2022; 15(4):517-522.

PMID: 35505887 PMC: 9046759. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13378.


Capturing indirect genetic effects on phenotypic variability: Competition meets canalization.

Marjanovic J, Mulder H, Ronnegard L, de Koning D, Bijma P Evol Appl. 2022; 15(4):694-705.

PMID: 35505880 PMC: 9046766. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13353.

References
1.
Ellen E, Rodenburg T, Albers G, Bolhuis J, Camerlink I, Duijvesteijn N . The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock. Front Genet. 2014; 5:377. PMC: 4227523. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00377. View

2.
Wagner G, Booth G, Bagheri-Chaichian H . A POPULATION GENETIC THEORY OF CANALIZATION. Evolution. 2017; 51(2):329-347. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02420.x. View

3.
Sae-Lim P, Kause A, Janhunen M, Vehvilainen H, Koskinen H, Gjerde B . Genetic (co)variance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) body weight and its uniformity across production environments. Genet Sel Evol. 2015; 47:46. PMC: 4435928. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0122-8. View

4.
Sorensen D, Waagepetersen R . Normal linear models with genetically structured residual variance heterogeneity: a case study. Genet Res. 2004; 82(3):207-22. DOI: 10.1017/s0016672303006426. View

5.
Moore A, Brodie 3rd E, Wolf J . INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS. Evolution. 2017; 51(5):1352-1362. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01458.x. View