» Articles » PMID: 35502771

Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of Their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study

Abstract

Background The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave-free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy. Methods and Results FFR/iFR were analyzed using a Verrata wire, and coronary flow reserve was analyzed using a Combomap machine (both Philips-Volcano). The risk polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase and for heme oxygenase-1 were analyzed. In total, 1884 FFR/iFR measurements from 1564 patients were included. The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in 393 measurements (20.9%): FFRp (positive)/iFRn (negative) type (264 lesions, 14.0%) and FFRn/iFRp (129 lesions, 6.8%) type. Coronary flow reserve was measured in 343 lesions, correlating better with iFR (R=0.56, <0.0001) than FFR (R=0.36, <0.0001). The coronary flow reserve value in FFRp/iFRn lesions (2.24±0.7) was significantly higher compared with both FFRp/iFRp (1.39±0.36), and FFRn/iFRn lesions (1.8±0.64, <0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed (1) sex, age, and lesion location in the right coronary artery as predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy; and (2) hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency as predictors for FFRn/iFRp discrepancy. The FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy was significantly more frequent in patients with both risk types of polymorphisms (endothelial nitric oxide synthase+heme oxygenase-1): 8 patients (24.2%) compared with FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy: 2 patients (5.9%), =0.03. Conclusions Predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy were sex, age, and location in the right coronary artery. Predictors for FFRn/iFRp were hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency. The risk type of polymorphism in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase-1 genes was more frequently found in patients with FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03033810.

Citing Articles

Role of physiology in the management of multivessel disease among patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Ganzorig N, Pompei G, Jenkins K, Wang W, Rubino F, Gill K AsiaIntervention. 2024; 10(3):157-168.

PMID: 39347110 PMC: 11413640. DOI: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00051.


Advances in the Computational Assessment of Disturbed Coronary Flow and Wall Shear Stress: A Contemporary Review.

Ekmejian A, Carpenter H, Ciofani J, Gray B, Allahwala U, Ward M J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(19):e037129.

PMID: 39291505 PMC: 11681461. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037129.


Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on the Coronary Revascularization Guided by Intracoronary Physiology: Results of the First Registry with Long-Term Follow-Up in a Latin American Population.

DallOrto C, Lopes R, Euripedes L, Pinto Filho G, da Silva M J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39057636 PMC: 11277174. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11070216.


Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio associated with long-term adverse clinical outcomes in patients deferred revascularization following fractional flow reserve.

Li F, Li X, Zhou J, Lin Q, Zhou Y, Zhu J Lipids Health Dis. 2024; 23(1):96.

PMID: 38566225 PMC: 10985980. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02093-1.


Nonatheromatous Coronary Kink Causing Angiographic Obstruction: A Rare Structural Anomaly.

Jhawar N, Prasad A, Gharacholou S Case Rep Cardiol. 2023; 2023:6626263.

PMID: 37645685 PMC: 10462445. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6626263.


References
1.
Jeremias A, Maehara A, Genereux P, Asrress K, Berry C, De Bruyne B . Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 63(13):1253-1261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.060. View

2.
Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Fineschi M, Manari A, Menozzi M, Secco G . Fractional Flow Reserve Evaluation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Analysis From a Multicenter Italian Registry (the FREAK Study). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 88(4):555-562. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26364. View

3.
Powell J, Higman D . Smoking, nitric oxide and the endothelium. Br J Surg. 1994; 81(6):785-7. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810602. View

4.
Arashi H, Satomi N, Ishida I, Soontorndhada K, Ebihara S, Tanaka K . Hemodynamic and Lesion Characteristics Associated with Discordance between the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve. J Interv Cardiol. 2019; 2019:3765282. PMC: 6739793. DOI: 10.1155/2019/3765282. View

5.
Muroya T, Kawano H, Hata S, Shinboku H, Sonoda K, Kusumoto S . Relationship between resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve in assessments of coronary stenosis severity. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 96(4):E432-E438. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28835. View