» Articles » PMID: 35501809

A Qualitative Study Exploring the Barriers to Attending Structured Education Programmes Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 May 3
PMID 35501809
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Diabetes self-management education, a universally recommended component of diabetes care, aims to support self-management in people with type 2 diabetes. However, attendance is low (approx. 10%). Previous research investigating the reasons for low attendance have not yet linked findings to theory, making it difficult to translate findings into practice. This study explores why some adults with type 2 diabetes do not attend diabetes self-management education and considers how services can be adapted accordingly, using Andersen's Behavioural Model of Health Service Utilisation as a framework.

Methods: A cross-sectional semi-structured qualitative interview study was carried out. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone with 14 adults with type 2 diabetes who had verbally declined their invitation to attend diabetes self-management education in Bath and North East Somerset, UK, within the last 2 years. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis before mapping the themes onto the factors of Andersen's Behavioural Model.

Results: Two main themes were identified: 'perceived need' and 'practical barriers'. The former theme explored participants' tendency to decline diabetes education when they perceived they did not need the programme. This perception tended to arise from participants' high self-efficacy to manage their type 2 diabetes, the low priority they attributed to their condition and limited knowledge about the programme. The latter theme, 'practical barriers', explored the notion that some participants wanted to attend but were unable to due to other commitments and/or transportation issues in getting to the venue.

Conclusions: All sub-themes resonated with one or more factors of Andersen's Behavioural Model indicating that the model may help to elucidate attendance barriers and ways to improve services. To fully understand low attendance to diabetes education, the complex and individualised reasons for non-attendance must be recognised and a person-centred approach should be taken to understand people's experience, needs and capabilities.

Citing Articles

Quality priorities related to the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: results from the COMPAS + quality improvement collaborative.

Gaid D, Giasson G, Gaboury I, Houle L, Layani G, Menear M BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):397.

PMID: 39550565 PMC: 11568624. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02641-9.


Factors associated with attendance at a pharmacist-led group diabetes self-management education class and impact on health outcomes.

Ramey O, Gildea C Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024; 16:100526.

PMID: 39498229 PMC: 11532769. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100526.


Diabetes self-management education programs: Results from a nationwide population-based study on characteristics of participants, rating of programs and reasons for non-participation.

Weise S, Du Y, Heidemann C, Baumert J, Frese T, Heise M PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310338.

PMID: 39264968 PMC: 11392325. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310338.


Accessibility of diabetes education in the United States: barriers, policy implications, and the road ahead.

Tharakan A, McPeek Hinz E, Zhu E, Denmeade B, German J, Huang W Health Aff Sch. 2024; 2(8):qxae097.

PMID: 39206435 PMC: 11350287. DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae097.


Author Response to Comment on: "Benefit-Risk Assessment of ChatGPT Applications in the Field of Diabetes and Metabolic Illnesses: A Qualitative Study".

Jairoun A, Al-Hemyari S, Shahwan M, Al-Qirim T, Shahwan M Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2024; 17:11795514241260240.

PMID: 38894857 PMC: 11184991. DOI: 10.1177/11795514241260240.


References
1.
Wens J, Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Sabbe B, Denekens J . GPs' perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients' adherence to treatment: A qualitative analysis of barriers and solutions. BMC Fam Pract. 2005; 6(1):20. PMC: 1156882. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-20. View

2.
Lo R, Maclean D . The dynamics of coping and adaptating to the impact when diagnosed with diabetes. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2002; 19(2):26-32. View

3.
Ducat L, Philipson L, Anderson B . The mental health comorbidities of diabetes. JAMA. 2014; 312(7):691-2. PMC: 4439400. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.8040. View

4.
Winkley K, Evwierhoma C, Amiel S, Lempp H, Ismail K, Forbes A . Patient explanations for non-attendance at structured diabetes education sessions for newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Diabet Med. 2014; 32(1):120-8. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12556. View

5.
Cooper H, Booth K, Gill G . Patients' perspectives on diabetes health care education. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18(2):191-206. DOI: 10.1093/her/18.2.191. View