GPs' Perspectives of Type 2 Diabetes Patients' Adherence to Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis of Barriers and Solutions

Overview

Journal BMC Fam Pract

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Health Services
Public Health

Date 2005 May 14

PMID 15890071

Citations 71

Authors

Johan Wens

Etienne Vermeire

Paul Van Royen

Bernard Sabbe

Joke Denekens

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The problem of poor compliance/adherence to prescribed treatments is very complex. Health professionals are rarely being asked how they handle the patient's (poor) therapy compliance/adherence. In this study, we examine explicitly the physicians' expectations of their diabetes patients' compliance/adherence. The objectives of our study were: (1) to elicit problems physicians encounter with type 2 diabetes patients' adherence to treatment recommendations; (2) to search for solutions and (3) to discover escape mechanisms in case of frustration.

Methods: In a descriptive qualitative study, we explored the thoughts and feelings of general practitioners (GPs) on patients' compliance/adherence. Forty interested GPs could be recruited for focus group participation. Five open ended questions were derived on the one hand from a similar qualitative study on compliance/adherence in patients living with type 2 diabetes and on the other hand from the results of a comprehensive review of recent literature on compliance/adherence. A well-trained diabetes nurse guided the GPs through the focus group sessions while an observer was attentive for non-verbal communication and interactions between participants. All focus groups were audio taped and transcribed for content analysis. Two researchers independently performed the initial coding. A first draft with results was sent to all participants for agreement on content and comprehensiveness.

Results: General practitioners experience problems with the patient's deficient knowledge and the fact they minimize the consequences of having and living with diabetes. It appears that great confidence in modern medical science does not stimulate many changes in life style. Doctors tend to be frustrated because their patients do not achieve the common Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) objectives, i.e. on health behavior and metabolic control. Relevant solutions, derived from qualitative studies, for better compliance/adherence seem to be communication, tailored and shared care. GPs felt that a structured consultation and follow-up in a multidisciplinary team might help to increase compliance/adherence. It was recognized that the GP's efforts do not always meet the patients' health expectations. This initiates GPs' frustration and leads to a paternalistic attitude, which may induce anxiety in the patient. GPs often assume that the best methods to increase compliance/adherence are shocking the patients, putting pressure on them and threatening to refer them to hospital.

Conclusion: GPs identified a number of problems with compliance/adherence and suggested solutions to improve it. GPs need communication skills to cope with patients' expectations and evidence based goals in a tailored approach to diabetes care.

Citing Articles

Advancements in the application of precision nursing model on hemodialysis for diabetic nephropathy: A review.

Ma J, Ma D Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(51):e40952.

PMID: 39705468 PMC: 11666179. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040952.

Recognition of language barriers in comprehending non-communicable disease management among rural elderly people in the DIMAMO surveillance area: a case of AWI-Gen participants.

Mashaba R, Seakamela K, Mbombi M, Muthelo L, Makoti P, Choma S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2782.

PMID: 39394102 PMC: 11468845. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20332-z.

Barriers and facilitators of providing standard of care diabetes management at primary care level in geriatric population.

Kumar P, Sinha A, Kumar A, Alam M J Family Med Prim Care. 2023; 11(10):6451-6457.

PMID: 36618174 PMC: 9810914. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_851_22.

Patient involvement in the encounter between general practice and patients with a chronic disease. Results of a scoping review focusing on type 2 diabetes and obstructive pulmonary disease.

Titlestad S, Marcussen M, Rasmussen M, Norgaard B Eur J Gen Pract. 2022; 28(1):260-269.

PMID: 36503359 PMC: 9754033. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2153827.

A qualitative study exploring the barriers to attending structured education programmes among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Coningsby I, Ainsworth B, Dack C BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):584.

PMID: 35501809 PMC: 9059690. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07980-w.

References

Kinmonth A, Woodcock A, Griffin S, Spiegal N, Campbell M . Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team. BMJ. 1998; 317(7167):1202-8. PMC: 28704. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1202. View

Cahill J . Patient participation: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 1996; 24(3):561-71. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22517.x. View

Krupat E, Stein T, Selby J, Yeager C, Schmittdiel J . Choice of a primary care physician and its relationship to adherence among patients with diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2002; 8(9):777-84. View

Murri R, Antinori A, Ammassari A, Nappa S, Orofino G, Abrescia N . Physician estimates of adherence and the patient-physician relationship as a setting to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003; 31 Suppl 3:S158-62. DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200212153-00015. View

. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998; 352(9131):854-65. View

Bissell P, May C, Noyce P . From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 58(4):851-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00259-4. View

Demyttenaere K . Risk factors and predictors of compliance in depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003; 13 Suppl 3:S69-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-977x(03)00095-6. View

Renders C, Valk G, Griffin S, Wagner E, Eijk J, Assendelft W . Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; (1):CD001481. PMC: 7045779. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001481. View

Donovan J . Patient decision making. The missing ingredient in compliance research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995; 11(3):443-55. DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300008667. View

10.

Demmer C . Relationship with health care provider and adherence to HIV medications. Psychol Rep. 2003; 93(2):494-6. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.2.494. View

11.

Mays N, Pope C . Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995; 311(6997):109-12. PMC: 2550154. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109. View

12.

Trostle J . Medical compliance as an ideology. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 27(12):1299-308. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90194-3. View

13.

Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denekens J . Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001; 26(5):331-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2001.00363.x. View

14.

Mead N, Bower P, Hann M . The impact of general practitioners' patient-centredness on patients' post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(2):283-99. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00171-x. View

15.

Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P . Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1999; 2(16):iii-ix, 1-274. View

16.

van den Arend I, Stolk R, Krans H, Grobbee D, Schrijvers A . Management of type 2 diabetes: a challenge for patient and physician. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 40(2):187-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00067-1. View

17.

Hunt L, Arar N . An analytical framework for contrasting patient and provider views of the process of chronic disease management. Med Anthropol Q. 2001; 15(3):347-67. DOI: 10.1525/maq.2001.15.3.347. View

18.

Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson R, Ubel P, Bernstein S, Hofer T . When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make?. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18(11):893-902. PMC: 1494939. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21132.x. View

19.

Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J . Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; (4):CD003267. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267. View

20.

. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002; 26 Suppl 1:S21-4. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s21. View