» Articles » PMID: 35478220

Returning Individual Research Results in International Direct-to-participant Genomic Research: Results from a 31-country Study

Overview
Journal Eur J Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2022 Apr 28
PMID 35478220
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper summarizes the results of a 31-country qualitative study of expert perspectives on the regulation of international "direct-to-participant" (DTP) genomic research. We outline how the practice of directly recruiting participants for genomic studies online complicates ethics and regulatory considerations for the return of individual research results. As part of a larger project supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, we prepared and distributed to 31 global legal experts a questionnaire intended to ascertain opinions and perspectives on the way international DTP genomic research is likely to be regulated. We found significant disagreement across jurisdictions on the most favorable approach to managing such results, with some countries favoring return by default and others preferring to return only with the express consent of research participants. We conclude by outlining policy considerations that should guide researcher practices in this context. As international DTP genomic research evolves, jurists and ethicists should be attentive to the ways novel approaches to subject recruitment align with existing ethical and regulatory norms in research with human participants. This paper is a preliminary step toward documenting such alignment in the context of the return of individual research results.

Citing Articles

Experts Speak Forum: Implementation of the FAIR Principles in Biobanking Needs Fair Incentives.

Simeon-Dubach D, Kozlakidis Z, Tayal J, McCall S, Hasan W, Betsou F Biopreserv Biobank. 2024; 22(6):557-562.

PMID: 39635895 PMC: 11656107. DOI: 10.1089/bio.2024.0153.


Perceptions of patient-reported outcome data access and sharing among patients with heart failure: ethical implications for research.

Mangal S, Nino de Rivera S, Reading Turchioe M, Myers A, Benda N, Goyal P Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023; 23(2):145-151.

PMID: 37172035 PMC: 10640657. DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad046.


Happy 30th birthday to the European Journal of Human Genetics!.

McNeill A Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(10):1095-1096.

PMID: 36221024 PMC: 9554020. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01188-6.

References
1.
Wolf S, Evans B . Return of results and data to study participants. Science. 2018; 362(6411):159-160. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav0005. View

2.
Levesque E, Joly Y, Simard J . Return of research results: general principles and international perspectives. J Law Med Ethics. 2011; 39(4):583-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00625.x. View

3.
Thorogood A, Dalpe G, Knoppers B . Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019; 27(4):535-546. PMC: 6460582. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0311-3. View

4.
Rothstein M, Zawati M, Knoppers B . Regulatory Landscape of International Direct-to-Participant (DTP) Genomic Research: Time to Untie the Gordian Knot?. J Law Med Ethics. 2019; 47(2):336-341. DOI: 10.1177/1073110519857291. View

5.
Sharif S, Blyth M, Ahmed M, Sheridan E, Saltus R, Yu J . Enhancing inclusion of diverse populations in genomics: A competence framework. J Genet Couns. 2020; 29(2):282-292. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1263. View