Use of Online Recruitment Strategies in a Randomized Trial of Cancer Survivors
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background/aims: Despite widespread Internet adoption, online advertising remains an underutilized tool to recruit participants into clinical trials. Whether online advertising is a cost-effective method to enroll participants compared to other traditional forms of recruitment is not known.
Methods: Recruitment for the Survivorship Promotion In Reducing IGF-1 Trial, a community-based study of cancer survivors, was conducted from June 2015 through December 2016 via in-person community fairs, advertisements in periodicals, and direct postal mailings. In addition, "Right Column" banner ads were purchased from Facebook to direct participants to the Survivorship Promotion In Reducing IGF-1 Trial website. Response rates, costs of traditional and online advertisements, and demographic data were determined and compared across different online and traditional recruitment strategies. Micro-trials optimizing features of online advertisements were also explored.
Results: Of the 406 respondents to our overall outreach efforts, 6% (24 of 406) were referred from online advertising. Facebook advertisements were shown over 3 million times (impressions) to 124,476 people, which resulted in 4401 clicks on our advertisement. Of these, 24 people ultimately contacted study staff, 6 underwent prescreening, and 4 enrolled in the study. The cost of online advertising per enrollee was $794 when targeting a general population versus $1426 when accounting for strategies that specifically targeted African Americans or men. By contrast, community fairs, direct mail, or periodicals cost $917, $799, or $436 per enrollee, respectively. Utilization of micro-trials to assess online ads identified subtleties (e.g. use of an advertisement title) that substantially impacted viewer interest in our trial.
Conclusion: Online advertisements effectively directed a relevant population to our website, which resulted in new enrollees in the Survivorship Promotion In Reducing IGF-1 Trial at a cost comparable to traditional methods. Costs were substantially greater with online recruitment when targeting under-represented populations, however. Additional research using online micro-trial tools is needed to evaluate means of more precise recruitment to improve yields in under-represented groups. Potential gains from faster recruitment speed remain to be determined.
Jerome G, Appel L, Bunyard L, Dalcin A, Durkin N, Charleston J JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e54126.
PMID: 38865181 PMC: 11208825. DOI: 10.2196/54126.
Corleto K, Strandmo J, Giles E Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(3).
PMID: 38543182 PMC: 10974219. DOI: 10.3390/ph17030396.
Wang R, Schweitzer J, Hernandez S, Molina S, Keegan T J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 7(1):e240.
PMID: 38028342 PMC: 10663769. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.669.
Ashfield S, Donelle L, Smith M, Dube E, Tryphonopoulos P Can J Nurs Res. 2023; 56(3):247-256.
PMID: 37853544 PMC: 11308297. DOI: 10.1177/08445621231207546.
Ejem D, Wechsler S, Gallups S, Khalidi S, Coffee-Dunning J, Montgomery A JCO Oncol Pract. 2023; 19(11):1020-1030.
PMID: 37733975 PMC: 10667016. DOI: 10.1200/OP.23.00117.