» Articles » PMID: 27896486

Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses

Overview
Date 2016 Nov 30
PMID 27896486
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is an auditory phenomenon where binaural tone-in-noise detection is improved when the phase of either signal or noise is inverted in one of the ears (SN or SN, respectively), relative to detection when signal and noise are in identical phase at each ear (SN). Processing related to BMLDs and interaural time differences has been confirmed in the auditory brainstem of non-human mammals; in the human auditory brainstem, phase-locked neural responses elicited by BMLD stimuli have not been systematically examined across signal-to-noise ratio. Behavioral and physiological testing was performed in three binaural stimulus conditions: SN, SN, and SN. BMLDs at 500 Hz were obtained from 14 young, normal-hearing adults (ages 21-26). Physiological BMLDs used the frequency-following response (FFR), a scalp-recorded auditory evoked potential dependent on sustained phase-locked neural activity; FFR tone-in-noise detection thresholds were used to calculate physiological BMLDs. FFR BMLDs were significantly smaller (poorer) than behavioral BMLDs, and FFR BMLDs did not reflect a physiological release from masking, on average. Raw FFR amplitude showed substantial reductions in the SN condition relative to SN and SN conditions, consistent with negative effects of phase summation from left and right ear FFRs. FFR amplitude differences between stimulus conditions (e.g., SN amplitude-SN amplitude) were significantly predictive of behavioral SN BMLDs; individuals with larger amplitude differences had larger (better) behavioral B MLDs and individuals with smaller amplitude differences had smaller (poorer) behavioral B MLDs. These data indicate a role for sustained phase-locked neural activity in BMLDs of humans and are the first to show predictive relationships between behavioral BMLDs and human brainstem responses.

Citing Articles

Masking level differences under two different measurement conditions: A normative study of young adults.

Cekic S, Mujdeci B, Karakoc K, Bas B Brain Behav. 2024; 14(9):e370011.

PMID: 39295079 PMC: 11410869. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70011.


Age-Related Deficits in Binaural Hearing: Contribution of Peripheral and Central Effects.

Tolnai S, Weiss M, Beutelmann R, Bankstahl J, Bovee S, Ross T J Neurosci. 2024; 44(16).

PMID: 38395618 PMC: 11026345. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0963-22.2024.


Effects of degraded speech processing and binaural unmasking investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Zhou X, Sobczak G, McKay C, Litovsky R PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0267588.

PMID: 35468160 PMC: 9037936. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267588.


Ambient noise exposure induces long-term adaptations in adult brainstem neurons.

Siveke I, Myoga M, Grothe B, Felmy F Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):5139.

PMID: 33664302 PMC: 7933235. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84230-9.


Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

So W, Smith S Int J Audiol. 2020; 60(11):875-884.

PMID: 33345686 PMC: 8244817. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1860260.


References
1.
Swaminathan J, Krishnan A, Gandour J, Xu Y . Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008; 55(1):281-7. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.896592. View

2.
SULLIVAN W, Konishi M . Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83(21):8400-4. PMC: 386936. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8400. View

3.
Dobie R, Wilson M . A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996; 100(4 Pt 1):2236-46. DOI: 10.1121/1.417933. View

4.
de Ribaupierre F, Rouiller E, Toros A, De Ribaupierre Y . Transmission delay of phase-locked cells in the medial geniculate body. Hear Res. 1980; 3(1):65-77. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(80)90008-8. View

5.
Aiken S, Picton T . Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds. Hear Res. 2008; 245(1-2):35-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.08.004. View