» Articles » PMID: 35460070

Human Papillomavirus-based Screening at Extended Intervals Missed Fewer Cervical Precancers Than Cytology in the HPV For Cervical Cancer (HPV FOCAL) Trial

Abstract

While cervix screening using cytology is recommended at 2- to 3-year intervals, given the increased sensitivity of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening to detect precancer, HPV-based screening is recommended every 4- to 5-years. As organized cervix screening programs transition from cytology to HPV-based screening with extended intervals, there is some concern that cancers will be missed between screens. Participants in HPV FOr CervicAL Cancer (HPV FOCAL) trial received cytology (Cytology Arm) at 24-month intervals or HPV-based screening (HPV Arm) at 48-month intervals; both arms received co-testing (cytology and HPV testing) at exit. We investigated the results of the co-test to identify participants with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) who would not have had their precancer detected if they had only their arm's respective primary screen. In the Cytology Arm, 25/62 (40.3%) identified CIN2+s were missed by primary screen (ie, normal cytology/positive HPV test) and all 25 had normal cytology at the prior 24-month screen. In the HPV arm, three CIN2+s (3/49, 6.1%) were missed by primary screen (ie, negative HPV test/abnormal cytology). One of these three misses had low-grade cytology findings and would also not have been referred to colposcopy outside of the trial. Multiple rounds of cytology did not detect some precancerous lesions detected with one round of HPV-based screening. In our population, cytology missed more CIN2+, even at shorter screening intervals, than HPV-based screening. This assuages concerns about missed detection postimplementation of an extended interval HPV-based screening program. We recommend that policymakers consider a shift from cytology to HPV-based cervix screening.

Citing Articles

The characteristics of high-risk HPV-negative cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lou J, Guo F Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1452834.

PMID: 39445063 PMC: 11496078. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1452834.


A real-world, cross-sectional, and longitudinal study on high-risk human papillomavirus genotype distribution in 31,942 women in Dongguan, China.

Zhong H, Pan W, Chen B, Gu J, Liang Y, Sun G Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1409030.

PMID: 39148652 PMC: 11325481. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1409030.


Evidence of Decreased Long-term Risk of Cervical Precancer after Negative Primary HPV Screens Compared with Negative Cytology Screens in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Gottschlich A, Hong Q, Gondara L, Alam M, Cook D, Martin R Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(7):904-911.

PMID: 38773687 PMC: 11216858. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1587.


Performance of DNA methylation analysis in the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN3+): a cross-sectional study.

Liu Y, Chen Y, Xiong J, Zhu P, An Y, Li S Infect Agent Cancer. 2023; 18(1):77.

PMID: 38031140 PMC: 10687787. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-023-00555-2.


The Role of p16/Ki67 Dual Staining in Cervical Cancer Screening.

Dovnik A, Repse Fokter A Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023; 45(10):8476-8491.

PMID: 37886977 PMC: 10605736. DOI: 10.3390/cimb45100534.


References
1.
Zorzi M, Frayle H, Rizzi M, Fedato C, Rugge M, Penon M . A 3-year interval is too short for re-screening women testing negative for human papillomavirus: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2017; 124(10):1585-1593. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14575. View

2.
Ogilvie G, Krajden M, van Niekerk D, Smith L, Cook D, Ceballos K . HPV for cervical cancer screening (HPV FOCAL): Complete Round 1 results of a randomized trial comparing HPV-based primary screening to liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016; 140(2):440-448. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30454. View

3.
Wentzensen N, Clarke M, Bremer R, Poitras N, Tokugawa D, Goldhoff P . Clinical Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Screening With p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Triage in a Large Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program. JAMA Intern Med. 2019; 179(7):881-888. PMC: 6515572. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0306. View

4.
Del Mistro A, Giorgi Rossi P, Frayle H, Pasquale L, Campari C, Ronco G . Five-year risk of CIN3 after short-term HPV-DNA negativity in cytology-negative women: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2019; 126(11):1365-1371. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15893. View

5.
Andersen B, Njor S, Jensen A, Johansen T, Jeppesen U, Svanholm H . HrHPV testing vs liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and older: a prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020; 30(11):1678-1683. PMC: 7656146. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001457. View