Validity and Absolute Reliability of the Cobb Angle in Idiopathic Scoliosis with TraumaMeter Software

The Cobb angle value is a critical parameter for evaluating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. This study aimed to evaluate a software’s validity and absolute reliability to determine the Cobb angle in AIS digital X-rays, with two different degrees of experienced observers. Four experts and four novice evaluators measured 35 scoliotic curves with the software on three separate occasions, one month apart. The observers re-measured the same radiographic studies on three separate occasions three months later but on conventional X-ray films. The differences between the mean bias errors (MBE) within the experience groups were statistically significant between the experts (software) and novices (manual) (p < 0.001) and between the novices (software) and novices (manual) (p = 0.005). When measured with the software, the intra-group error in the expert group was MBE = 1.71 ± 0.61° and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2,1)) = 0.986, and in the novice group, MBE = 1.9 ± 0.67° and ICC (2,1) = 0.97. There was almost a perfect concordance among the two measurement methods, ICC (2,1) = 0.998 and minimum detectable change (MCD95) < 0.4°. Control of the intrinsic error sources enabled obtaining inter- and intra-observer MDC95 < 0.5° in the two experience groups and with the two measurement methods. The computer-aided software TraumaMeter increases the validity and reliability of Cobb angle measurements concerning manual measurement.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Mis-Selection of End Vertebrae and Its Effect on Measuring Cobb Angle and Curve Length in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Hurtado-Aviles J, Leon-Munoz V, Santonja-Medina F, Raimondi P, Martinez-Martinez F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124828 PMC: 11313236. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154562.

Association Between Two Methods of Spinal and Pelvic Analysis Among Children With Cerebral Palsy.

Ali M, Usama M J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2024; 24(1):67-72.

PMID: 38427370 PMC: 10910198.

SOX9 gene shows association with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis predisposition in Northwest Indians.

Singh H, Shipra , Gupta M, Gupta N, Gupta G, Pandita A Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):66.

PMID: 38245767 PMC: 10799485. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01635-8.

SCOLIONET: An Automated Scoliosis Cobb Angle Quantification Using Enhanced X-ray Images and Deep Learning Models.

Maaliw 3rd R J Imaging. 2023; 9(12).

PMID: 38132683 PMC: 10743962. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging9120265.

Defining "successful" treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review.

Joarder I, Taniguchi S, Mendoza A, Snow M Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(4):1204-1244.

PMID: 36847911 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07592-w.

References

Aubin C, Bellefleur C, Joncas J, de Lanauze D, Kadoury S, Blanke K . Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(12):E780-90. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f0825a. View

Ylikoski M, Tallroth K . Measurement variations in scoliotic angle, vertebral rotation, vertebral body height, and intervertebral disc space height. J Spinal Disord. 1990; 3(4):387-91. View

Dang N, Moreau M, Hill D, Mahood J, Raso J . Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the Spinal Deformity Study Group's AIS Radiographic Measurement Manual. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(9):1064-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160840.51621.6b. View

Morrissy R, Goldsmith G, Hall E, Kehl D, Cowie G . Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(3):320-7. View

Zmurko M, Mooney 3rd J, Podeszwa D, Minster G, Mendelow M, Guirgues A . Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2004; 12(4):208-13. View

Mok J, Berven S, Diab M, Hackbarth M, Hu S, Deviren V . Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(6):681-6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166aa8d. View

Langensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, Fricke O, Franklin J, Schonau E . Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(11):2360-71. PMC: 3886494. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2693-9. View

Hefti F . Pathogenesis and biomechanics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). J Child Orthop. 2014; 7(1):17-24. PMC: 3566249. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0460-9. View

Vrtovec T, Vengust R, Likar B, Pernus F . Analysis of four manual and a computerized method for measuring axial vertebral rotation in computed tomography images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(12):E535-41. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cb8d2b. View

10.

Mohanty S, Pai Kanhangad M, Gullia A . Curve severity and apical vertebral rotation and their association with curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020; 105(3):303-308. PMC: 8578183. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-020-00660-0. View

11.

Zhang J, Lou E, Hill D, Raso J, Wang Y, Le L . Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009; 48(2):185-95. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0556-7. View

12.

Carman D, Browne R, Birch J . Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(3):328-33. View

13.

Hattori T, Sakaura H, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K . In vivo three-dimensional segmental analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(10):1745-50. PMC: 3175875. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1869-4. View

14.

Tamura Y, Sugano N, Sasama T, Sato Y, Tamura S, Yonenobu K . Surface-based registration accuracy of CT-based image-guided spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2004; 14(3):291-7. PMC: 3476741. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0797-y. View

15.

Kuklo T, Potter B, Lenke L . Vertebral rotation and thoracic torsion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what is the best radiographic correlate?. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18(2):139-47. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000159033.89623.bc. View

16.

Segev E, Hemo Y, Wientroub S, Ovadia D, Fishkin M, Steinberg D . Intra- and interobserver reliability analysis of digital radiographic measurements for pediatric orthopedic parameters using a novel PACS integrated computer software program. J Child Orthop. 2011; 4(4):331-41. PMC: 2908339. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-010-0259-5. View

17.

Ricart P, Andres T, Apazidis A, Errico T, Trobisch P . Validity of Cobb angle measurements using digitally photographed radiographs. Spine J. 2011; 11(10):942-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.003. View

18.

Hopkins W . Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000; 30(1):1-15. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001. View

19.

Loder R, Spiegel D, Gutknecht S, Kleist K, Ly T, Mehbod A . The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(22):2548-53. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144828.72721.d8. View

20.

Lonstein J, Carlson J . The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(7):1061-71. View