Measuring Procedures to Determine the Cobb Angle in Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2013 Feb 28

PMID 23443679

Citations 62

Authors

S Langensiepen

O Semler

R Sobottke

O Fricke

J Franklin

E Schonau

P Eysel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Scoliosis of the vertebral column can be assessed with the Cobb angle (Cobb 1948). This examination is performed manually by measuring the angle on radiographs and is considered the gold standard. However, studies evaluating the reproducibility of this procedure have shown high variability in intra- and inter-observer agreement. Because of technical advancements, interests in new procedures to determine the Cobb angle has been renewed. This review aims to systematically investigate the reproducibility of various new techniques to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis and to assess whether new technical procedures are reasonable alternatives when compared to manual measurement of the Cobb angle.

Method: Systematic review. Studies examining procedures used to determine the Cobb angle were selected. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Statistical results of reliability and agreement were summarised and described.

Results: Eleven studies of new measuring procedures were included, all reporting the reproducibility. The new procedures can be divided into computer-assisted procedures, automatic procedures and smartphone apps.

Conclusions: All investigated measuring procedures showed high degrees of reliability. In general, digital procedures tend to be slightly better than manual ones. For all other measurement procedures (automatic or smartphone), results varied. Studies implementing vertebral pre-selection and observer training achieved better agreement.

Citing Articles

Systematic Review of Clinical Outcome Parameters of Conservative Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.

Kuru Colak T, Durmus B, Saatci E, Caglar E, Akcay B, Maeso S J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004591 PMC: 11856454. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041063.

The Application of Integrated Force and Temperature Sensors to Enhance Orthotic Treatment Monitoring in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Pilot Study.

Zou Y, Zhou L, Wang J, Lou E, Wong M Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(3).

PMID: 39943325 PMC: 11819978. DOI: 10.3390/s25030686.

Which Method of the Radiologic Measurements of the Angle of Curvature in Idiopathic Scoliosis is the Most Reliable for an Inexperienced Researcher?.

Wilinski P, Piekutin A, Dmowska K, Zawieja W, Janusz P Indian J Orthop. 2025; 59(2):140-147.

PMID: 39886266 PMC: 11775360. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01307-z.

A Retrospective Analysis of 190 Patients With Scoliosis Referred to a Private Australian Clinical Advisory Service Between 2017 and 2020.

Austin-Candler S, Carson J, Cheung R, Vuong W, Boakes A, Engel R J Chiropr Med. 2025; 23(4):171-177.

PMID: 39776825 PMC: 11701887. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.003.

A Feasibility Study of a Controlled Standing Fulcrum Side-Bending Test in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Wong C, Koutras C, Shayestehpour H, Dahl B, Otaduya M, Rasmussen J J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768732 PMC: 11676229. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247809.

References

Allen S, Parent E, Khorasani M, Hill D, Lou E, Raso J . Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Digit Imaging. 2007; 21(2):208-18. PMC: 3043859. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7. View

Lucas N, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Bogduk N . The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL). J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(8):854-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.10.002. View

Lonstein J, Carlson J . The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(7):1061-71. View

Srinivasalu S, Modi H, Smehta S, Suh S, Chen T, Murun T . Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using computer measurement of digitally acquired radiographs-intraobserver and interobserver variability. Asian Spine J. 2010; 2(2):90-3. PMC: 2852087. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2008.2.2.90. View

Whiting P, Rutjes A, Dinnes J, Reitsma J, Bossuyt P, Kleijnen J . Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8(25):iii, 1-234. DOI: 10.3310/hta8250. View

de Vet H, Terwee C, Knol D, Bouter L . When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59(10):1033-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015. View

Zhang J, Lou E, Shi X, Wang Y, Hill D, Raso J . A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010; 23(6):383-7. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bb9a3c. View

Shea K, Stevens P, Nelson M, Smith J, Masters K, Yandow S . A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(5):551-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00007. View

Bartlett J, Frost C . Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31(4):466-75. DOI: 10.1002/uog.5256. View

10.

Corona J, Sanders J, Luhmann S, Diab M, Vitale M . Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(12):e86. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00311. View

11.

Pruijs J, Hageman M, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen J . Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol. 1994; 23(7):517-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF00223081. View

12.

Zhang J, Lou E, Hill D, Raso J, Wang Y, Le L . Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009; 48(2):185-95. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0556-7. View

13.

Zhang J, Lou E, Le L, Hill D, Raso J, Wang Y . Automatic Cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough Transform with vertebral shape prior. J Digit Imaging. 2008; 22(5):463-72. PMC: 3043716. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-008-9127-y. View

14.

Tanure M, Pinheiro A, Oliveira A . Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods. Spine J. 2010; 10(9):769-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.020. View

15.

Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Grivas T . Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(13):1285-93. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc48f4. View

16.

Romano M, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Kotwicki T . Exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (8):CD007837. PMC: 7386883. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007837.pub2. View

17.

Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

18.

Goldberg M, Poitras B, Mayo N, Labelle H, Bourassa R, Cloutier R . Observer variation in assessing spinal curvature and skeletal development in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(12):1371-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198812000-00008. View

19.

Jones J, Krow A, Hariharan S, Weekes L . Measuring angles on digitalized radiographic images using Microsoft PowerPoint. West Indian Med J. 2009; 57(1):14-9. View

20.

Shaw M, Adam C, Izatt M, Licina P, Askin G . Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(6):1062-8. PMC: 3366139. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2059-0. View