» Articles » PMID: 35451852

Post-mortem Perinatal Imaging: What is the Evidence?

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Apr 22
PMID 35451852
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Post-mortem imaging for the investigation of perinatal deaths is an acceptable tool amongst parents and religious groups, enabling a less invasive autopsy examination. Nevertheless, availability is scarce nationwide, and there is some debate amongst radiologists regarding the best practice and optimal protocols for performing such studies. Much of the published literature to date focusses on single centre experiences or interesting case reports. Diagnostic accuracy studies are available for a variety of individual imaging modalities ( post-mortem CT, MRI, ultrasound and micro-CT), however, assimilating this information is important when attempting to start a local service.In this article, we present a comprehensive review summarising the latest research, recently published international guidelines, and describe which imaging modalities are best suited for specific indications. When the antenatal clinical findings are not supported by the post-mortem imaging, we also suggest how and when an invasive autopsy may be considered. In general, a collaborative working relationship within a multidisciplinary team (consisting of radiologists, radiographers, the local pathology department, mortuary staff, foetal medicine specialists, obstetricians and bereavement midwives) is vital for a successful service.

Citing Articles

When Hemorrhage Hides a Fetal Brain Tumor, Importance of Fetal Autopsy.

Comba C, Sartor A, Laquerriere A, Sevely A, Raveneau M, Chaix Y Clin Case Rep. 2024; 12(12):e9684.

PMID: 39655287 PMC: 11626085. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.9684.


The Role of Plain Radiography in Assessing Aborted Foetal Musculoskeletal Anomalies in Everyday Practice.

Rossini B, Carnevale A, Parenti G, Zago S, Sigolo G, Feletti F J Imaging. 2024; 10(10).

PMID: 39452405 PMC: 11508908. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10100242.


Whole-body non-forensic fetal virtopsy using postmortem magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla vs classical autopsy.

Staicu A, Albu C, Popa-Stanila R, Bondor C, Chiriac L, Eniu D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 64(5):661-668.

PMID: 39376058 PMC: 11579436. DOI: 10.1002/uog.29106.


Fetal and neonatal post-mortem imaging referral template: recommendations from the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Post-mortem Task Force.

DHondt A, Shelmerdine S, Arthurs O Pediatr Radiol. 2024; 54(10):1713-1719.

PMID: 39112568 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-06017-0.


Body weight-based iodinated contrast immersion timing for human fetal postmortem microfocus computed tomography.

Simcock I, Shelmerdine S, Hutchinson J, Sebire N, Arthurs O BJR Open. 2024; 6(1):tzad006.

PMID: 38352185 PMC: 10860501. DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzad006.


References
1.
Leadbetter K, Vesoulis Z, White F, Schmidt R, Khanna G, Shimony J . The role of post-mortem MRI in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2016; 37(1):98-103. PMC: 5215703. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.156. View

2.
Simcock I, Shelmerdine S, Hutchinson J, Sebire N, Arthurs O . Human fetal whole-body postmortem microfocus computed tomographic imaging. Nat Protoc. 2021; 16(5):2594-2614. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00512-6. View

3.
Rodriguez M, Prats P, Rodriguez I, Cusi V, Comas C . Concordance between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings in a tertiary center. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 34(8):784-9. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4368. View

4.
Nayak S, Shukla A, Lewis L, Kadavigere R, Mathew M, Adiga P . Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and its impact on genetic counseling. Prenat Diagn. 2015; 35(7):685-91. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4592. View

5.
Kang X, Cannie M, Arthurs O, Segers V, Fourneau C, Bevilacqua E . Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(8):3542-3553. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4725-4. View