» Articles » PMID: 35439961

Impact of Baseline Impedance of Pulmonary Vein Antrum on Success of Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Ablation Index

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Apr 20
PMID 35439961
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Ablation index (AI) is an effective ablation quality marker. Impedance is also an important factor for lesion formation. The present study evaluated the influence of the baseline impedance in the effect of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) guided by AI.

Methods: This was a retrospective study. 101 patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) were enrolled. All patients underwent radiofrequency ablation guided by the same AI strategy. The ablation strategy was pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with non-PV triggers ablation. The baseline impedance of the ablation points was recorded. The patients were followed up every 3 months or so.

Results: During a median follow-up of 12 (4-14) months, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence were 82.2%. No difference existed in baseline characteristics between the success group and the recurrence group. The average baseline impedance was 124.3 ± 9.7 Ω. The baseline impedance of the ablation points in success group was lower compared to the recurrence group (122.9 ± 9.4 vs. 130.5 ± 8.8 Ω, P < 0.01). The ratio of impedance drop in the success group was higher than the recurrence group ([8.8 ± 1.4]% vs. [8.1 ± 1.2]%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline impedance, PAF duration and AI were the independent predictors of AF recurrence. The cumulative free of recurrence rate of low-impedance group (≤ 124 Ω, n = 54) was higher than that of high-impedance group.

Conclusion: Baseline impedance correlates with clinical outcome of radiofrequency ablation for PAF guided by AI. Higher impedance in the same AI strategy may result in an ineffective lesion which probably causes recurrence.

Citing Articles

Impact of the dispersive patch placement on dissipated power in radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation via a virtual patient study.

Anees M, Moreno Weidmann Z, Vilades Medel D, Guerra J, Gerardo-Giorda L, Petras A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6986.

PMID: 40011542 PMC: 11865282. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90158-1.


Body mass index as a determinant of scar formation post-AF ablation: Insights from DECAAF II.

Bidaoui G, Tsakiris E, Younes H, Feng H, Assaf A, Chouman N J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024; 35(12):2330-2341.

PMID: 39350356 PMC: 11650536. DOI: 10.1111/jce.16448.


How to ablate the septo-pulmonary bundle: a case-based review of percutaneous ablation strategies to achieve roof line block.

Tonko J, Silberbauer J, Mann I Europace. 2023; 25(10).

PMID: 37713215 PMC: 10558061. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad283.


Evaluation of lesion characteristics and baseline impedance on high-power short-duration radiofrequency catheter ablation using computer simulation.

Sun Y, Zhu X, Nakamura K, Wang S Heart Vessels. 2023; 38(12):1459-1467.

PMID: 37650926 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-023-02300-6.

References
1.
Anselmino M, Matta M, Bunch T, Fiala M, Scaglione M, Nolker G . Conduction recovery following catheter ablation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 240:240-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.067. View

2.
Verma A, Jiang C, Betts T, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R . Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(19):1812-22. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288. View

3.
Nath S, DiMarco J, Gallop R, McRury I, Haines D . Effects of dispersive electrode position and surface area on electrical parameters and temperature during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 77(9):765-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89215-6. View

4.
Shah S, Barakat A, Saliba W, Rehman K, Tarakji K, Rickard J . Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Initial Long-Term Ablation Success: Electrophysiological Findings and Outcomes of Repeat Ablation Procedures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018; 11(4):e005785. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005785. View

5.
Wang D, Hulse J, Walsh E, Saul J . Factors influencing impedance during radiofrequency ablation in humans. Chin Med J (Engl). 1995; 108(6):450-5. View