» Articles » PMID: 35434060

Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Apr 18
PMID 35434060
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a worldwide pandemic and significant public health issue. The effectiveness of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in treating COVID-19 patients has been called into question.

Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis on the mortality of COVID-19 patients who require ECMO.

Methods: This analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes 2020 (PRISMA) and has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number CRD42020227414). A quality assessment for all the included articles was performed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Studies with tenor more COVID-19 patients undergoing ECMO were included. The random-effects model was used to obtain the pooled incidence of mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO. The source of heterogeneity was investigated using subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results: We identified 18 articles with 1494 COVID-19 patients who were receiving ECMO. The score of the quality assessment ranged from 5 to 8 on the NOS. The majority of patients received veno-venous ECMO (93.7%). Overall mortality was estimated to be 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-0.39; = 84.8%] based on random-effect pooled estimates. There were significant differences in mortality between location groups (33.0% 55.0% 37.0% 18.0%, < 0.001), setting groups (28.0% 34.0%, < 0.001), sample size (37.0% 31.0%, < 0.001), and NOS groups (39.0% 19.0%, < 0.001). However, both subgroup analyses based on location, setting, and sample size, and sensitivity analysis failed to identify the source of heterogeneity. The funnel plot indicated no evident asymmetry, and the Egger's ( = 0.95) and Begg's ( = 0.14) tests also revealed no significant publication bias.

Conclusion: With more resource assessment and risk-benefit analysis, our data reveal that ECMO might be a feasible and effective treatment for COVID-19 patients.

Citing Articles

Prone Positioning During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome With COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis.

Shen M, Huai J Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e53049.

PMID: 38410333 PMC: 10896011. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53049.


Relationship between the Pre-ECMO and ECMO Time and Survival of Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tan Z, Su L, Chen X, He H, Long Y J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38337562 PMC: 10856383. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030868.

References
1.
Namendys-Silva S . ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19. Heart Lung. 2020; 49(4):348-349. PMC: 7194678. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.03.012. View

2.
Xu J, Yang X, Yang L, Zou X, Wang Y, Wu Y . Clinical course and predictors of 60-day mortality in 239 critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter retrospective study from Wuhan, China. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):394. PMC: 7336107. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03098-9. View

3.
Guihaire J, Owyang C, Madhok J, Laverdure F, Gaillard M, Girault A . Specific Considerations for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. ASAIO J. 2020; 66(10):1069-1072. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001251. View

4.
Le Breton C, Besset S, Freita-Ramos S, Amouretti M, Billiet P, Dao M . Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Crit Care. 2020; 60:10-12. PMC: 7365051. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.07.013. View

5.
Xie J, Wu W, Li S, Hu Y, Hu M, Li J . Clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with novel coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) in China: a retrospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(10):1863-1872. PMC: 7439240. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06211-2. View