Learning from the Implementation of a Quality Improvement Intervention in Australian General Practice: a Qualitative Analysis of Participants Views of a CVD Preventive Care Project

Overview

Journal BMC Prim Care

Specialties Health Services
Public Health

Date 2022 Apr 15

PMID 35421935

Authors

C M Hespe

E Brown

L Rychetnik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement collaborative projects aim to reduce gaps in clinical care provided in the healthcare system. This study evaluated the experience of key participants from a Quality Improvement Program (QPulse) that focussed on cardiovascular disease assessment and management. The study goal was to identify critical barriers and factors enabling the implementation of a quality improvement framework in Australian general practice.

Methods: This qualitative study examined in-depth semi-structured interviews with nineteen purposively-selected participants of the QPulse project. Interviewees were from General Practices and the local supporting organisation, a Primary Health Network. Interviews were analysed thematically using the Complex Systems Improvement framework, focusing on five domains: strategy, culture, structure, workforce and technology.

Results: Despite reported engagement with QPulse objectives to improve cardiovascular preventive care, implementation barriers associated with this program were considerable for all interviewees. Adoption of the quality improvement process was reliant on designated leadership, aligned practice culture, organised systems for clear communication, tailored education and utilisation of clinical audit and review processes. Rather than practice size and location, practice culture and governance alignment to quality improvement predicted successful implementation. Financial incentives for both general practice and the Primary Health Network were also identified as prerequisites for systematised quality improvement projects in the future, along with individualised support and education for each general practice. Technology was both an enabler and a barrier, and the Primary Health Network was seen as key to assisting the successful utilisation of the available tools.

Conclusions: Implementation of Quality Improvement programs remains a potential tool for achieving better health outcomes in General Practice. However, enablers such as financial incentives, individualised education and support provided via a supporting organisation, and IT tools and support are crucial if the full potential of Quality Improvement programs are to be realised in the Australian healthcare setting.

Trial Registration: ACTRN12615000108516 , UTN U1111-1163-7995.

References

Hobbs F, Jukema J, da Silva P, McCormack T, Catapano A . Barriers to cardiovascular disease risk scoring and primary prevention in Europe. QJM. 2010; 103(10):727-39. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq122. View

Cornell S, Pickles K, Crosland P, de Wet C, Trevena L, Bonner C . The role of Primary Health Networks in cardiovascular disease prevention: A qualitative interview study. Health Promot J Austr. 2021; 33(3):926-936. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.552. View

Fernholm R, Arvidsson E, Wettermark B . Financial incentives linked to quality improvement projects in Swedish primary care: a model for improving quality of care. BMJ Open Qual. 2019; 8(2):e000402. PMC: 6567957. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000402. View

Peiris D, Usherwood T, Panaretto K, Harris M, Hunt J, Redfern J . Effect of a computer-guided, quality improvement program for cardiovascular disease risk management in primary health care: the treatment of cardiovascular risk using electronic decision support cluster-randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015; 8(1):87-95. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001235. View

Banks E, Crouch S, Korda R, Stavreski B, Page K, Thurber K . Absolute risk of cardiovascular disease events, and blood pressure- and lipid-lowering therapy in Australia. Med J Aust. 2016; 204(8):320. DOI: 10.5694/mja15.01004. View

Crossland L, Janamian T, Jackson C . Key elements of high-quality practice organisation in primary health care: a systematic review. Med J Aust. 2014; 201(3 Suppl):S47-51. DOI: 10.5694/mja14.00305. View

Sposito A, Ramires J, Jukema J, Molina J, da Silva P, Ghadanfar M . Physicians' attitudes and adherence to use of risk scores for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: cross-sectional survey in three world regions. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009; 25(5):1171-8. DOI: 10.1185/03007990902846423. View

Janamian T, Jackson C, Glasson N, Nicholson C . A systematic review of the challenges to implementation of the patient-centred medical home: lessons for Australia. Med J Aust. 2014; 201(3 Suppl):S69-73. DOI: 10.5694/mja14.00295. View

Metusela C, Dijkmans-Hadley B, Mullan J, Gow A, Bonney A . Implementation of a patient centred medical home (PCMH) initiative in general practices in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):120. PMC: 8215740. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01485-x. View

10.

Redfern J, Hafiz N, Hyun K, Knight A, Hespe C, Chow C . QUality improvement in primary care to prevent hospitalisations and improve Effectiveness and efficiency of care for people Living with coronary heart disease (QUEL): protocol for a 24-month cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2020; 21(1):36. PMC: 7020350. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01105-0. View

11.

Bonner C, Fajardo M, Doust J, McCaffery K, Trevena L . Implementing cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines to translate evidence-based medicine and shared decision making into general practice: theory-based intervention development, qualitative piloting and quantitative feasibility. Implement Sci. 2019; 14(1):86. PMC: 6716813. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0927-x. View

12.

Peiris D, Agaliotis M, Patel B, Patel A . Validation of a general practice audit and data extraction tool. Aust Fam Physician. 2013; 42(11):816-9. View

13.

Knight A . The collaborative method. A strategy for improving Australian general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2004; 33(4):269-74. View

14.

Kraft S, Carayon P, Weiss J, Pandhi N . A simple framework for complex system improvement. Am J Med Qual. 2014; 30(3):223-31. PMC: 4193943. DOI: 10.1177/1062860614530184. View

15.

Berwick D . The question of improvement. JAMA. 2012; 307(19):2093-4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.4146. View

16.

Batalden P, Davidoff F . What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare?. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007; 16(1):2-3. PMC: 2464920. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.022046. View

17.

Scholl I, LaRussa A, Hahlweg P, Kobrin S, Elwyn G . Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them - a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1):40. PMC: 5845212. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0731-z. View

18.

Mannion R, Davies H . Understanding organisational culture for healthcare quality improvement. BMJ. 2018; 363:k4907. PMC: 6260242. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4907. View

19.

Levinson W, Wong B . Aligning continuing professional development with quality improvement. CMAJ. 2021; 193(18):E647-E648. PMC: 8112632. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.202797. View

20.

Peiris D, Usherwood T, Panaretto K, Harris M, Hunt J, Patel B . The Treatment of cardiovascular Risk in Primary care using Electronic Decision supOrt (TORPEDO) study-intervention development and protocol for a cluster randomised, controlled trial of an electronic decision support and quality improvement.... BMJ Open. 2012; 2(6). PMC: 3533097. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002177. View