» Articles » PMID: 35421389

Coarse-grained Modeling Reveals the Impact Of supercoiling and Loop Length in DNA Looping Kinetics

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2022 Apr 14
PMID 35421389
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Measurements of protein-mediated DNA looping reveal that in vivo conditions favor the formation of loops shorter than those that occur in vitro, yet the precise physical mechanisms underlying this shift remain unclear. To understand the extent to which in vivo supercoiling may explain these shifts, we develop a theoretical model based on coarse-grained molecular simulation and analytical transition state theory, enabling us to map out looping energetics and kinetics as a function of two key biophysical parameters: superhelical density and loop length. We show that loops on the scale of a persistence length respond to supercoiling over a much wider range of superhelical densities and to a larger extent than longer loops. This effect arises from a tendency for loops to be centered on the plectonemic end region, which bends progressively more tightly with superhelical density. This trend reveals a mechanism by which supercoiling favors shorter loop lengths. In addition, our model predicts a complex kinetic response to supercoiling for a given loop length, governed by a competition between an enhanced rate of looping due to torsional buckling and a reduction in looping rate due to chain straightening as the plectoneme tightens at higher superhelical densities. Together, these effects lead to a flattening of the kinetic response to supercoiling within the physiological range for all but the shortest loops. Using experimental estimates for in vivo superhelical densities, we discuss our model's ability to explain available looping data, highlighting both the importance of supercoiling as a regulatory force in genetics and the additional complexities of looping phenomena in vivo.

Citing Articles

Chromatinization modulates topoisomerase II processivity.

Lee J, Wu M, Inman J, Singh G, Ha Park S, Lee J Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6844.

PMID: 37891161 PMC: 10611788. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42600-z.


Chromatinization Modulates Topoisomerase II Processivity.

Lee J, Wu M, Inman J, Singh G, Ha Park S, Lee J bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37873421 PMC: 10592930. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.03.560726.

References
1.
Tse D, Becker N, Young R, Olson W, Peters J, Schwab T . Designed architectural proteins that tune DNA looping in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(18):10382-10396. PMC: 8501960. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab759. View

2.
Hao N, Shearwin K, Dodd I . Programmable DNA looping using engineered bivalent dCas9 complexes. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):1628. PMC: 5696343. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01873-x. View

3.
Huang J, Schlick T, Vologodskii A . Dynamics of site juxtaposition in supercoiled DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(3):968-73. PMC: 14693. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.968. View

4.
Rui S, Tse-Dinh Y . Topoisomerase function during bacterial responses to environmental challenge. Front Biosci. 2002; 8:d256-63. DOI: 10.2741/984. View

5.
Krajina B, Spakowitz A . Large-Scale Conformational Transitions in Supercoiled DNA Revealed by Coarse-Grained Simulation. Biophys J. 2016; 111(7):1339-1349. PMC: 5052444. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.07.045. View