» Articles » PMID: 35412657

The Potential Impacts of Invasions on Native Symbionts

Overview
Journal Ecology
Date 2022 Apr 12
PMID 35412657
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Symbionts, including parasites, pathogens, and mutualists, can play important roles in determining whether or not invasions by host species will be successful. Loss of enemies from the native habitat, such as parasites and pathogens, can allow for higher invader fitness in the invaded habitat. The presence of mutualists (e.g., pollinators, seed dispersers, mycorrhizae, and rhizobial bacteria) in the invaded habitat can facilitate invasion success. Although there has been a great deal of research focusing on how invading hosts may benefit from enemy losses or mutualist gains, far less attention has focused on how native symbiont populations and communities respond to invasion by non-indigenous hosts and symbionts. In this paper, we present a conceptual framework examining how symbionts such as parasites, pathogens, commensals, and mutualists can influence invader success and whether these native symbionts will benefit or decline during invasion. The first major factor in this framework is the competence of the invading host relative to the native hosts. Low- or non-competent hosts that support few if any native symbionts could cause declines in native symbiont taxa. Competent invading hosts could potentially support native parasites, pathogens, commensals, and mutualists, especially if there is a closely related or similar host in the invaded range. These symbionts could inhibit or facilitate invasion or have no discernible effect on the invading host. An understanding of how native symbionts interact with competent versus non-competent invading hosts as well as various invading symbionts is critical to our understanding of invasion success, its consequences for invaded communities and how native symbionts in these communities will fare in the face of invasion.

Citing Articles

Impacts of invasion on a freshwater cleaning symbiosis.

Bell S, McElmurray P, Creed R, Brown B Oecologia. 2024; 205(3-4):669-680.

PMID: 39097560 PMC: 11358191. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-024-05600-4.


The mycobiome of a successful crayfish invader and its changes along the environmental gradient.

Dragicevic P, Bielen A, Zucko J, Hudina S Anim Microbiome. 2023; 5(1):23.

PMID: 37041598 PMC: 10088235. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-023-00245-9.


The potential impacts of invasions on native symbionts.

Creed R, Brown B, Skelton J Ecology. 2022; 103(8):e3726.

PMID: 35412657 PMC: 9539604. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3726.

References
1.
Grman E . Plant species differ in their ability to reduce allocation to non-beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology. 2012; 93(4):711-8. DOI: 10.1890/11-1358.1. View

2.
Stricker K, Harmon P, Goss E, Clay K, Flory S . Emergence and accumulation of novel pathogens suppress an invasive species. Ecol Lett. 2016; 19(4):469-77. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12583. View

3.
Owen J, Delany M, Cardona C, Bickford A, Mullens B . Host inflammatory response governs fitness in an avian ectoparasite, the northern fowl mite (Ornithonyssus sylviarum). Int J Parasitol. 2009; 39(7):789-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.12.008. View

4.
Farrell K, Creed R, Brown B . Preventing overexploitation in a mutualism: partner regulation in the crayfish-branchiobdellid symbiosis. Oecologia. 2013; 174(2):501-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2780-y. View

5.
Keesing F, Holt R, Ostfeld R . Effects of species diversity on disease risk. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(4):485-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00885.x. View