» Articles » PMID: 35393784

Molecular Landscape of TP53 Mutations in Breast Cancer and Their Utility for Predicting the Response to HER-targeted Therapy in HER2 Amplification-positive and HER2 Mutation-positive Amplification-negative Patients

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Apr 8
PMID 35393784
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We used targeted capture sequencing to analyze TP53-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in metastatic breast cancer patients and to determine whether TP53 mutation has predictive value for anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) treatment for in HER2 amplification-positive patients (HER2+) and HER2 mutation-positive, amplification-negative (HER2-/mut) patients.

Patients And Methods: TP53 mutation features were analyzed in the Geneplus cohort (n = 1184). The MSK-BREAST cohort was used to explore the value of TP53 mutation in predicting anti-HER-2 antibody efficacy. Sequencing of ctDNA in phase Ib, phase Ic, phase II clinical trials of pyrotinib (HER2+ patients), and an investigator-initiated phase II study of pyrotinib (HER2-/mut patients) were performed to analyze the relationships between TP53 mutation and prognosis for HER2 TKIs. The MSK-BREAST cohort, MutHER, and SUMMIT cohort were used for verification.

Results: TP53 mutations were detected in 53.1% (629/1184) of patients in the Geneplus cohort. The TP53 mutation rate was higher in HR-negative (p < 0.001) and HER2 amplification-positive (p = 0.015) patients. Among patients receiving anti-HER2 antibody therapy, those whose tumors carried TP53 mutations had a shorter PFS (p = 0.004). However, the value of TP53 mutation in predicting HER2 TKI response was inconsistent. In HER2+ patients, no difference in PFS was observed among patients with different TP53 statuses in the combined analysis of the pyrotinib phase Ib, phase Ic, and phase II clinical trials (p = 1.00) or in the MSK-BREAST cohort (p = 0.62). In HER2-/mut patients, TP53 mutation-positive patients exhibited a trend toward worse prognosis with anti-HER2 TKI treatment than TP53-wild-type patients in our investigator-initiated phase II study (p = 0.15), and this trend was confirmed in the combined analysis of the MutHER and SUMMIT cohorts (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: TP53 mutation can be used to identify biomarkers of anti-HER2 antibody drug resistance in HER2+ patients and HER2 TKI resistance in HER2-/mut patients.

Citing Articles

Clinical Relevance of Mutation and Its Characteristics in Breast Cancer with Long-Term Follow-Up Date.

Hwang S, Baek S, Lee M, Kook Y, Bae S, Ahn S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39682089 PMC: 11640694. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16233899.


Prevalence and treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-altered non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis and systematic literature review.

Yap N, Perumal K, Rajadurai P Ecancermedicalscience. 2024; 18:1734.

PMID: 39421181 PMC: 11484687. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1734.


Circulating Tumor DNA and Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dickinson K, Sharma A, Agnihotram R, Altuntur S, Park M, Meterissian S JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(9):e2431722.

PMID: 39235812 PMC: 11378006. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31722.


Dynamic changes in tumor profiling reveal intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity focused on an uncharacterized HER2 mutation: a case report of a young breast cancer patient.

Schaffrin-Nabe D, Josten-Nabe A, Tannapfel A, Uhl W, Garmer M, Kurzrock R Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1395618.

PMID: 38764581 PMC: 11099277. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395618.


Circulating Tumor DNA Is a Variant of Liquid Biopsy with Predictive and Prognostic Clinical Value in Breast Cancer Patients.

Zavarykina T, Lomskova P, Pronina I, Khokhlova S, Stenina M, Sukhikh G Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(23).

PMID: 38069396 PMC: 10706922. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242317073.


References
1.
Donehower L, Soussi T, Korkut A, Liu Y, Schultz A, Cardenas M . Integrated Analysis of TP53 Gene and Pathway Alterations in The Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell Rep. 2019; 28(5):1370-1384.e5. PMC: 7546539. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.001. View

2.
Razavi P, Chang M, Xu G, Bandlamudi C, Ross D, Vasan N . The Genomic Landscape of Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancers. Cancer Cell. 2018; 34(3):427-438.e6. PMC: 6327853. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.008. View

3.
Yallowitz A, Ghaleb A, Garcia L, Alexandrova E, Marchenko N . Heat shock factor 1 confers resistance to lapatinib in ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018; 9(6):621. PMC: 5967334. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-018-0691-x. View

4.
Fribbens C, OLeary B, Kilburn L, Hrebien S, Garcia-Murillas I, Beaney M . Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(25):2961-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3061. View

5.
Canale M, Petracci E, Delmonte A, Bronte G, Chiadini E, Ludovini V . Concomitant Mutation Confers Worse Prognosis in -Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with TKIs. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(4). PMC: 7230306. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041047. View