» Articles » PMID: 35393409

Assessing the Inflammatory Response to in Vitro Polymicrobial Wound Biofilms in a Skin Epidermis Model

Overview
Date 2022 Apr 8
PMID 35393409
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Wounds can commonly become infected with polymicrobial biofilms containing bacterial and fungal microorganisms. Microbial colonization of the wound can interfere with sufficient healing and repair, leading to high rates of chronicity in certain individuals, which can have a huge socioeconomic burden worldwide. One route for alleviating biofilm formation in chronic wounds is sufficient treatment of the infected area with topical wound washes and ointments. Thus, the primary aim here was to create a complex in vitro biofilm model containing a range of microorganisms commonly isolated from the infected wound milieu. These polymicrobial biofilms were treated with three conventional anti-biofilm wound washes, chlorhexidine (CHX), povidone-iodine (PVP-I), and hydrogen peroxide (HO), and efficacy against the microorganisms assessed using live/dead qPCR. All treatments reduced the viability of the biofilms, although HO was found to be the most effective treatment modality. These biofilms were then co-cultured with 3D skin epidermis to assess the inflammatory profile within the tissue. A detailed transcriptional and proteomic profile of the epidermis was gathered following biofilm stimulation. At the transcriptional level, all treatments reduced the expression of inflammatory markers back to baseline (untreated tissue controls). Olink technology revealed a unique proteomic response in the tissue following stimulation with untreated and CHX-treated biofilms. This highlights treatment choice for clinicians could be dictated by how the tissue responds to such biofilm treatment, and not merely how effective the treatment is in killing the biofilm.

Citing Articles

Lactams Exhibit Potent Antifungal Activity Against Monospecies and Multispecies Interkingdom Biofilms on a Novel Hydrogel Skin Model.

Abduljalil H, Alshanta O, Chougule S, Butcher M, Short B, McLean W APMIS. 2025; 133(1):e13510.

PMID: 39791268 PMC: 11718591. DOI: 10.1111/apm.13510.


Multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis from chronic wounds impair healing in human wound model.

Dinic M, Verpile R, Burgess J, Ming J, Marjanovic J, Beliz C Wound Repair Regen. 2024; 32(6):799-810.

PMID: 39439244 PMC: 11584363. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13231.


A Systematic Literature Review on Inflammatory Markers in the Saliva of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Cause or a Consequence of Periodontal Diseases.

Arcas V, Tig I, Moga D, Vlad A, Roman-Filip C, Fratila A Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929476 PMC: 11205661. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060859.


Novel methodologies for host-microbe interactions and microbiome-targeted therapeutics in 3D organotypic skin models.

Rikken G, Meesters L, Jansen P, Rodijk-Olthuis D, van Vlijmen-Willems I, Niehues H Microbiome. 2023; 11(1):227.

PMID: 37849006 PMC: 10580606. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-023-01668-x.


Characterization and Molecular Modelling of Non-Antibiotic Nanohybrids for Wound Healing Purposes.

Valentino C, Martinez Rodriguez T, Borrego-Sanchez A, Hernandez Benavides P, Arrebola Vargas F, Paredes J Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 37111626 PMC: 10142211. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041140.


References
1.
Kerr M, Barron E, Chadwick P, Evans T, Kong W, Rayman G . The cost of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations to the National Health Service in England. Diabet Med. 2019; 36(8):995-1002. DOI: 10.1111/dme.13973. View

2.
Guest J, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, Uchegbu I, Gerrish A, Weidlich D . Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(12):e009283. PMC: 4679939. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283. View

3.
Armstrong D, Swerdlow M, Armstrong A, Conte M, Padula W, Bus S . Five year mortality and direct costs of care for people with diabetic foot complications are comparable to cancer. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020; 13(1):16. PMC: 7092527. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2. View

4.
Malik A, Mohammad Z, Ahmad J . The diabetic foot infections: biofilms and antimicrobial resistance. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2013; 7(2):101-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2013.02.006. View

5.
Jia L, Parker C, Parker T, Kinnear E, Derhy P, Alvarado A . Incidence and risk factors for developing infection in patients presenting with uninfected diabetic foot ulcers. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177916. PMC: 5435321. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177916. View