In Vitro Physicochemical Characterization of Five Root Canal Sealers and Their Influence on an Ex Vivo Oral Multi-species Biofilm Community

Overview

Journal Int Endod J

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2022 Apr 6

PMID 35383959

Authors

Flavia M Saavedra

Lauter E Pelepenko

William S Boyle

Anqi Zhang

Christopher Staley

Mark C Herzberg

Marina A Marciano

Bruno P Lima

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the physicochemical properties of five root canal sealers and assess their effect on an ex vivo dental plaque-derived polymicrobial community.

Methodology: Dental plaque-derived microbial communities were exposed to the sealers (AH Plus [AHP], GuttaFlow Bioseal [GFB], Endoseal MTA [ESM], Bio-C sealer [BCS] and BioRoot RCS [BRR]) for 3, 6 and 18 h. The sealers' effect on the biofilm biomass and metabolic activity was quantified using crystal violet (CV) staining and MTT assay, respectively. Biofilm community composition and morphology were assessed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), 16S rRNA sequencing and scanning electron microscopy. The ISO6876:2012 specifications were followed to determine the setting time, radiopacity, flowability and solubility. Obturated acrylic teeth were used to assess the sealers' effect on pH. Surface chemical characterization was performed using SEM with coupled energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. One-way anova and Tukey's tests were used to analyze data from setting time, radiopacity, flowability and solubility. Two-way anova and Dunnett's tests were used for the data analysis from CV, MTT and pH. 16S rRNA sequencing data were analyzed for alpha (Shannon index and Chao analysis) and beta diversity (Bray-Curtis dissimilarities). Differences in community composition were evaluated by analysis of similarity (p < .05).

Results: The sealers significantly influenced microbial community composition and morphology. All sealers complied with ISO6876:2012 requirements for setting time, radiopacity and flowability. Although only AHP effectively reduced the biofilm biomass, all sealers, except BRR, reduced biofilm metabolic activity.

Conclusion: Despite adequate physical properties, none of the sealers tested prevented biofilm growth. Significant changes in community composition were observed. If observed in vivo, these changes could affect intracanal microbial survival, pathogenicity and treatment outcomes.

Citing Articles

Physicochemical properties and biological interaction of calcium silicate-based sealers - in vivo model.

Janini A, Moraes B, Pelepenko L, Dos Santos V, Barros-Costa M, Malosa G Clin Oral Investig. 2025; 29(1):86.

PMID: 39856465 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-025-06150-6.

Antibiofilm Efficacy of Calcium Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.

Ruiz-Linares M, Fedoseev V, Solana C, Munoz-Sandoval C, Ferrer-Luque C Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(16).

PMID: 39203118 PMC: 11355656. DOI: 10.3390/ma17163937.

The effect of dental material type and masticatory forces on periodontitis-derived subgingival microbiomes.

Montoya C, Baraniya D, Chen T, Al-Hebshi N, Orrego S Biofilm. 2024; 7:100199.

PMID: 38800100 PMC: 11127099. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100199.

-acyl homoserine lactone signaling modulates bacterial community associated with human dental plaque.

Sikdar R, Beauclaire M, Lima B, Herzberg M, Elias M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38559107 PMC: 10980036. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.15.585217.

A comparative study of biological properties of three root canal sealers.

Yan Y, Li Y, Chi Y, Ji M, Shen Y, Zou L Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 28(1):11.

PMID: 38129367 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05402-7.

References

Shin J, Lee D, Lee S . Comparison of antimicrobial activity of traditional and new developed root sealers against pathogens related root canal. J Dent Sci. 2019; 13(1):54-59. PMC: 6388800. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.10.007. View

Hancock 3rd H, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Moiseiwitsch J . Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in a North American population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91(5):579-86. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2001.113587. View

Azam A, Ahmed A, Oves M, Khan M, Habib S, Memic A . Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012; 7:6003-9. PMC: 3519005. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S35347. View

Kaur A, Shah N, Logani A, Mishra N . Biotoxicity of commonly used root canal sealers: A meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18(2):83-8. PMC: 4379664. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.153054. View

Yamane K, Ogawa K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H, Nakamura T, Yamanaka T . Identification and characterization of clinically isolated biofilm-forming gram-positive rods from teeth associated with persistent apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2009; 35(3):347-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.032. View

Sfeir G, Zogheib C, Patel S, Giraud T, Nagendrababu V, Bukiet F . Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Narrative Review and Clinical Perspectives. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(14). PMC: 8306764. DOI: 10.3390/ma14143965. View

Staley C, Kaiser T, Vaughn B, Graiziger C, Hamilton M, Rehman T . Predicting recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection following encapsulated fecal microbiota transplantation. Microbiome. 2018; 6(1):166. PMC: 6145197. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0549-6. View

Lim M, Jung C, Shin D, Cho Y, Song M . Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review. Restor Dent Endod. 2020; 45(3):e35. PMC: 7431927. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35. View

Tian Y, He X, Torralba M, Yooseph S, Nelson K, Lux R . Using DGGE profiling to develop a novel culture medium suitable for oral microbial communities. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2010; 25(5):357-67. PMC: 2951289. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2010.00585.x. View

10.

Ricucci D, Langeland K . Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J. 2004; 31(6):394-409. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00183.x. View

11.

Marciano M, Duarte M, Camilleri J . Calcium silicate-based sealers: Assessment of physicochemical properties, porosity and hydration. Dent Mater. 2016; 32(2):e30-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.008. View

12.

Lima A, Ganguly T, Walker A, Acosta N, Francisco P, Pileggi R . Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Streptococcus mutans Strains Isolated from Endodontic Infections. J Endod. 2020; 46(12):1876-1883. PMC: 7686129. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.002. View

13.

Siqueira Jr J, Rocas I . Catonella morbi and Granulicatella adiacens: new species in endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102(2):259-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.021. View

14.

Siqueira Jr J . Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J. 2001; 34(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x. View

15.

Tzanetakis G, Azcarate-Peril M, Zachaki S, Panopoulos P, Kontakiotis E, Madianos P . Comparison of Bacterial Community Composition of Primary and Persistent Endodontic Infections Using Pyrosequencing. J Endod. 2015; 41(8):1226-33. PMC: 4578635. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.010. View

16.

Gohl D, Vangay P, Garbe J, MacLean A, Hauge A, Becker A . Systematic improvement of amplicon marker gene methods for increased accuracy in microbiome studies. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(9):942-9. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3601. View

17.

Estrela C, Sydney G, Bammann L, Felippe Junior O . Mechanism of action of calcium and hydroxyl ions of calcium hydroxide on tissue and bacteria. Braz Dent J. 1995; 6(2):85-90. View

18.

Pelepenko L, Saavedra F, Antunes T, Bombarda G, Gomes B, Zaia A . Physicochemical, antimicrobial, and biological properties of White-MTAFlow. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 25(2):663-672. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03543-7. View

19.

Kitagawa H, Kitagawa R, Tsuboi R, Hirose N, Thongthai P, Sakai H . Development of endodontic sealers containing antimicrobial-loaded polymer particles with long-term antibacterial effects. Dent Mater. 2021; 37(8):1248-1259. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.04.008. View

20.

Costalonga M, Herzberg M . The oral microbiome and the immunobiology of periodontal disease and caries. Immunol Lett. 2014; 162(2 Pt A):22-38. PMC: 4346134. DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2014.08.017. View