» Articles » PMID: 35377782

Interacting Pest Control and Pollination Services in Coffee Systems

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Apr 4
PMID 35377782
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biodiversity-mediated ecosystem services (ES) support human well-being, but their values are typically estimated individually. Although ES are part of complex socioecological systems, we know surprisingly little about how multiple ES interact ecologically and economically. Interactions could be positive (synergy), negative (trade-offs), or absent (additive effects), with strong implications for management and valuation. Here, we evaluate the interactions of two ES, pollination and pest control, via a factorial field experiment in 30 Costa Rican coffee farms. We found synergistic interactions between these two critical ES to crop production. The combined positive effects of birds and bees on fruit set, fruit weight, and fruit weight uniformity were greater than their individual effects. This represents experimental evidence at realistic farm scales of positive interactions among ES in agricultural systems. These synergies suggest that assessments of individual ES may underestimate the benefits biodiversity provides to agriculture and human well-being. Using our experimental results, we demonstrate that bird pest control and bee pollination services translate directly into monetary benefits to coffee farmers. Excluding both birds and bees resulted in an average yield reduction of 24.7% (equivalent to losing US$1,066.00/ha). These findings highlight that habitat enhancements to support native biodiversity can have multiple benefits for coffee, a valuable crop that supports rural livelihoods worldwide. Accounting for potential interactions among ES is essential to quantifying their combined ecological and economic value.

Citing Articles

Complexity and entropy of natural patterns.

Wang H, Song C, Gao P PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(10):pgae417.

PMID: 39529863 PMC: 11552627. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae417.


Complementary effects of pollination and biocontrol services enable ecological intensification in macadamia orchards.

Anders M, Westphal C, Linden V, Weier S, Taylor P, Grass I Ecol Appl. 2024; 34(8):e3049.

PMID: 39415670 PMC: 11610654. DOI: 10.1002/eap.3049.


Lessons from Ethiopian coffee landscapes for global conservation in a post-wild world.

Hylander K, Nemomissa S, Fischer J, Zewdie B, Ayalew B, Tack A Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):714.

PMID: 38858451 PMC: 11164958. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06381-5.


Optimal restoration for pollination services increases forest cover while doubling agricultural profits.

Lopez-Cubillos S, McDonald-Madden E, Mayfield M, Runting R PLoS Biol. 2023; 21(5):e3002107.

PMID: 37220120 PMC: 10204975. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002107.


Ecological quality as a coffee quality enhancer. A review.

Torrez V, Benavides-Frias C, Jacobi J, Speranza C Agron Sustain Dev. 2023; 43(1):19.

PMID: 36748099 PMC: 9894527. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-023-00874-z.


References
1.
Kremen C . Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecol Lett. 2011; 8(5):468-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x. View

2.
Kessler A, Baldwin I . Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002; 53:299-328. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135207. View

3.
Damon A . A review of the biology and control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Bull Entomol Res. 2000; 90(6):453-65. DOI: 10.1017/s0007485300000584. View

4.
Boreux V, Kushalappa C, Vaast P, Ghazoul J . Interactive effects among ecosystem services and management practices on crop production: pollination in coffee agroforestry systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(21):8387-92. PMC: 3666681. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210590110. View

5.
Barber N, Adler L, Theis N, Hazzard R, Kiers E . Herbivory reduces plant interactions with above- and belowground antagonists and mutualists. Ecology. 2012; 93(7):1560-70. DOI: 10.1890/11-1691.1. View