» Articles » PMID: 35369743

From Inter-group Conflict to Inter-group Cooperation: Insights from Social Insects

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Apr 4
PMID 35369743
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The conflict between social groups is widespread, often imposing significant costs across multiple groups. The social insects make an ideal system for investigating inter-group relationships, because their interaction types span the full harming-helping continuum, from aggressive conflict, to mutual tolerance, to cooperation between spatially separate groups. Here we review inter-group conflict in the social insects and the various means by which they reduce the costs of conflict, including individual or colony-level avoidance, ritualistic behaviours and even group fusion. At the opposite extreme of the harming-helping continuum, social insect groups may peacefully exchange resources and thus cooperate between groups in a manner rare outside human societies. We discuss the role of population viscosity in favouring inter-group cooperation. We present a model encompassing intra- and inter-group interactions, and local and long-distance dispersal. We show that in this multi-level population structure, the increased likelihood of cooperative partners being kin is balanced by increased kin competition, such that neither cooperation (helping) nor conflict (harming) is favoured. This model provides a baseline context in which other intra- and inter-group processes act, tipping the balance toward or away from conflict. We discuss future directions for research into the ecological factors shaping the evolution of inter-group interactions. This article is part of the theme issue 'Intergroup conflict across taxa'.

Citing Articles

Random walks with spatial and temporal resets can explain individual and colony-level searching patterns in ants.

Lecheval V, Robinson E, Mann R J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(216):20240149.

PMID: 39081113 PMC: 11289642. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0149.


Indirect reciprocity can foster large-scale cooperation.

Gross J, Meder Z, Romano A, De Dreu C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(27):e2409894121.

PMID: 38913888 PMC: 11228482. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2409894121.


Signals of belonging: emergence of signalling norms as facilitators of trust and parochial cooperation.

Macanovic A, Tsvetkova M, Przepiorka W, Buskens V Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1897):20230029.

PMID: 38244608 PMC: 10799729. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0029.


Transmission of social status drives cooperation and offspring philopatry.

Rodrigues A, Gardner A Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2011):20231314.

PMID: 38018113 PMC: 10685119. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1314.


Group Formation and the Evolution of Human Social Organization.

De Dreu C, Gross J, Romano A Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023; 19(2):320-334.

PMID: 37450408 PMC: 10913362. DOI: 10.1177/17456916231179156.


References
1.
Pepper J . Relatedness in trait group models of social evolution. J Theor Biol. 2000; 206(3):355-68. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2132. View

2.
Kummerli R, Gardner A, West S, Griffin A . Limited dispersal, budding dispersal, and cooperation: an experimental study. Evolution. 2009; 63(4):939-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00548.x. View

3.
Wild G, Fernandes A . Investment in the public good through conditional phenotypes of large effect. J Evol Biol. 2009; 22(5):927-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01711.x. View

4.
Suarez A, Holway D, Case T . Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: Insights from Argentine ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(3):1095-100. PMC: 14714. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1095. View

5.
Cunningham J, Hereward J, Heard T, De Barro P, West S . Bees at war: interspecific battles and nest usurpation in stingless bees. Am Nat. 2014; 184(6):777-86. DOI: 10.1086/678399. View