» Articles » PMID: 35359387

Pretreatment DCE-MRI-Based Deep Learning Outperforms Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Apr 1
PMID 35359387
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the performances of deep learning (DL) to radiomics analysis (RA) in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) based on pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in breast cancer.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study included 356 breast cancer patients who underwent DCE-MRI before NAC and underwent surgery after NAC. Image features and kinetic parameters of tumors were derived from DCE-MRI. Molecular information was assessed based on immunohistochemistry results. The image-based RA and DL models were constructed by adding kinetic parameters or molecular information to image-only linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and convolutional neural network (CNN) models. The predictive performances of developed models were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with the DeLong method.

Results: The overall pCR rate was 23.3% (83/356). The area under the ROC (AUROC) of the image-kinetic-molecular RA model was 0.781 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.735, 0.828], which was higher than that of the image-kinetic RA model (0.629, 95% CI: 0.595, 0.663; < 0.001) and comparable to that of the image-molecular RA model (0.755, 95% CI: 0.708, 0.802; = 0.133). The AUROC of the image-kinetic-molecular DL model was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.816, 0.847), which was higher than that of the image-kinetic and image-molecular DL models (0.707, 95% CI: 0.654, 0.761; 0.79, 95% CI: 0.768, 0.812; < 0.001) and higher than that of the image-kinetic-molecular RA model (0.778, 95% CI: 0.735, 0.828; < 0.001).

Conclusions: The pretreatment DCE-MRI-based DL model is superior to the RA model in predicting pCR to NAC in breast cancer patients. The image-kinetic-molecular DL model has the best prediction performance.

Citing Articles

Combined morphology and radiomics of intravoxel incoherent movement as a predictive model for the pathologic complete response before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Zheng Y, Zhang H, Chen H, Song Y, Lu P, Ma M Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1452128.

PMID: 40007999 PMC: 11850367. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1452128.


Combining Biology-based and MRI Data-driven Modeling to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Stowers C, Wu C, Xu Z, Kumar S, Yam C, Son J Radiol Artif Intell. 2024; 7(1):e240124.

PMID: 39503605 PMC: 11791743. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.240124.


Advancing personalized oncology: a systematic review on the integration of artificial intelligence in monitoring neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer patients.

Hachache R, Yahyaouy A, Riffi J, Tairi H, Abibou S, Adoui M BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1300.

PMID: 39434042 PMC: 11495077. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13049-0.


Deep-learning based discrimination of pathologic complete response using MRI in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer.

Kim S, Lee J, Cho N, Kim Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23065.

PMID: 39367159 PMC: 11452398. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74276-w.


Prediction of early clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Triple-negative breast cancer: Incorporating Radiomics through breast MRI.

Lee H, Lee J, Lee J, Na Y, Park M, Lee J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21691.

PMID: 39289507 PMC: 11408492. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72581-y.


References
1.
Reig B . Radiomics and deep learning methods in expanding the use of screening breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(8):5863-5865. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08056-9. View

2.
Fan M, Chen H, You C, Liu L, Gu Y, Peng W . Radiomics of Tumor Heterogeneity in Longitudinal Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 8:622219. PMC: 8044916. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.622219. View

3.
Truhn D, Schrading S, Haarburger C, Schneider H, Merhof D, Kuhl C . Radiomic versus Convolutional Neural Networks Analysis for Classification of Contrast-enhancing Lesions at Multiparametric Breast MRI. Radiology. 2018; 290(2):290-297. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181352. View

4.
Racz A, Bajusz D, Heberger K . Modelling methods and cross-validation variants in QSAR: a multi-level analysis. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2018; 29(9):661-674. DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2018.1505778. View

5.
Sun Q, Lin X, Zhao Y, Li L, Yan K, Liang D . Deep Learning vs. Radiomics for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer Using Ultrasound Images: Don't Forget the Peritumoral Region. Front Oncol. 2020; 10:53. PMC: 7006026. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00053. View