» Articles » PMID: 35354232

Use of HEAVEN Criteria for Predicting Difficult Intubation in the Emergency Department

Overview
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2022 Mar 31
PMID 35354232
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Most airway prediction tools only consider anatomical factors. The HEAVEN criteria incorporate both anatomical and physiological elements, but have never been studied in the emergency department. This study aimed to evaluate the association between HEAVEN criteria and intubation difficulty.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study from April 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021 in the emergency department of a tertiary public hospital. All patients requiring rapid-sequence or delayed-sequence intubation were included. Patients intubated during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. We enrolled 174 patients. Study endpoints were first pass success and intubation complications.

Results: The presence of any HEAVEN criteria was associated with a decrease in the first pass success rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.43; P < 0.01). The anatomical challenge was the only criterion associated with first pass sucess (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05- 0.29; P < 0.01), whilst other criteria (hypoxemia, extremes of size, vomit/blood/fluid, exsanguination, and neck mobility) were not (P > 0.05). All anatomical factor criteria were associated with difficult airway view (P < 0.05). Intubation complications occurred more in the presence of hypoxemia (OR, 7.44; 95% CI, 2.82-19.63; P < 0.01) and vomit/blood/fluid (OR, 5.55; 95% CI, 2.39-12.92; P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Anatomical challenge in HEAVEN criteria can predict first pass success. All anatomical factors in HEAVEN criteria could predict difficult airway view and peri-intubation hypoxemia could be used to anticipate intubation complications. More validation studies are still needed to evaluate the use of HEAVEN criteria as a predictor tool for difficult airway.

Citing Articles

Torrential intraoral bleed in a mandibular arteriovenous malformation: Resuscitation under nonoperating room settings.

Chaudhary R, Jain G, Arjunan D, Bhattarai A Saudi J Anaesth. 2024; 18(4):596-598.

PMID: 39600449 PMC: 11587980. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_320_24.


A Prospective Study Evaluating Gender Differences of Serious Outcomes through Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) in the Emergency Department.

Waheed S, Jawed R, Raheem A, Mian A Crit Care Res Pract. 2024; 2024:4622511.

PMID: 38803994 PMC: 11129900. DOI: 10.1155/2024/4622511.


Current trends in emergency airway management: a clinical review.

Nah S, Lee Y, Choi S, Lee J, Hwang S, Lim S Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024; 11(3):243-258.

PMID: 38485262 PMC: 11467457. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.23.173.

References
1.
Bodily J, Webb H, Weiss S, Braude D . Incidence and Duration of Continuously Measured Oxygen Desaturation During Emergency Department Intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 67(3):389-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.006. View

2.
Koh L, Kong C, Ip-Yam P . The modified Cormack-Lehane score for the grading of direct laryngoscopy: evaluation in the Asian population. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002; 30(1):48-51. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X0203000109. View

3.
De Jong A, Molinari N, Terzi N, Mongardon N, Arnal J, Guitton C . Early identification of patients at risk for difficult intubation in the intensive care unit: development and validation of the MACOCHA score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 187(8):832-9. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1851OC. View

4.
Hagiwara Y, Watase H, Okamoto H, Goto T, Hasegawa K . Prospective validation of the modified LEMON criteria to predict difficult intubation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33(10):1492-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.038. View

5.
Mort T . Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99(2):607-13, table of contents. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15. View