» Articles » PMID: 35352460

Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis and Its Clinical Significance in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Overview
Journal Hepatol Res
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2022 Mar 30
PMID 35352460
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Liver fibrosis is the most important prognostic factor in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several noninvasive markers for fibrosis, including blood-based markers and imaging based-markers have been developed. Indirect fibrosis markers (e.g., fibrosis-4 index and NAFLD fibrosis score) consist of standard laboratory data and clinical parameters. Given its availability and high negative predictive value for advanced fibrosis, these markers are suitable for screening at primary care. Blood-based fibrogenesis markers (enhanced liver fibrosis and N-terminal propeptide of type 3 collagen), ultrasound-based modalities (vibration-controlled transient elastography, point shear wave elastography [SWE], and two-dimensional SWE), and magnetic resonance elastography have high diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis and are suitable for diagnosing liver fibrosis at secondary care centers. Sequential use of these markers can increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce health care costs. Furthermore, combining noninvasive makers may assist in identifying candidates for pharmacological trials and reducing screening failure. Emerging data suggest that these noninvasive markers are associated with liver-related events (hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensation) and mortality. Furthermore, delta change in noninvasive markers over time is also associated with time-course change in fibrosis, liver-related event risk, and mortality risk. However, the association between liver fibrosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is still controversial. CVD risk may decrease in patients with decompensated liver disease and noninvasive markers may be useful for assessing CVD risk in these patients. Therefore, noninvasive markers may be utilized as measures of fibrosis as well as real-time prognostic tools, in place of liver biopsy.

Citing Articles

Predictive performance of noninvasive factors for liver fibrosis in severe obesity: a screening based on machine learning models.

Jamialahmadi T, Azizmohammad Looha M, Jangjoo S, Emami N, Abdalla M, Ganjali M J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025; 24(1):54.

PMID: 39834350 PMC: 11741961. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-025-01564-1.


The steatosis-associated fibrosis estimator score is a useful indicator of recurrence and survival after initial curative hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Bekki T, Ohira M, Imaoka Y, Hattori M, Nakano R, Sakai H Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025; 9(1):178-187.

PMID: 39759992 PMC: 11693554. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12846.


Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score for Diagnosing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis.

Tamaki N, Takaura K, Higuchi M, Yasui Y, Itakura J, Tsuchiya K Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(13).

PMID: 39001207 PMC: 11240480. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131317.


Value of Mac-2 Binding Protein Glycosylation Isomer (M2BPGi) in Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Liver Disease: A Comprehensive Review of its Serum Biomarker Role.

Sotoudeheian M, Sotoudeheian M Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2024; 26(1):6-21.

PMID: 38982921 DOI: 10.2174/0113892037315931240618085529.


Bystander Effects and Profibrotic Interactions in Hepatic Stellate Cells during HIV and HCV Coinfection.

Cevallos C, Jarmoluk P, Sviercz F, Lopez C, Freiberger R, Delpino M J Immunol Res. 2024; 2024:6343757.

PMID: 38715844 PMC: 11074826. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6343757.


References
1.
Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine J, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M . The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2017; 67(1):328-357. DOI: 10.1002/hep.29367. View

2.
Niikura T, Imajo K, Ozaki A, Kobayashi T, Iwaki M, Honda Y . Coronary Artery Disease is More Severe in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis than Fatty Liver. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(3). PMC: 7151007. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10030129. View

3.
Imajo K, Kessoku T, Honda Y, Tomeno W, Ogawa Y, Mawatari H . Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography. Gastroenterology. 2015; 150(3):626-637.e7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.048. View

4.
Bravo A, Sheth S, Chopra S . Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(7):495-500. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440706. View

5.
Wong G, Chan H, Choi P, Chan A, Lo A, Chim A . Association between anthropometric parameters and measurements of liver stiffness by transient elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 11(3):295-302.e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.09.025. View