The ENCOMPASS Framework: a Practical Guide for the Evaluation of Public Health Programmes in Complex Adaptive Systems
Overview
Orthopedics
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Systems thinking embraces the complexity of public health problems, including childhood overweight and obesity. It aids in understanding how factors are interrelated, and it can be targeted to produce favourable changes in a system. There is a growing call for systems approaches in public health research, yet limited practical guidance is available on how to evaluate public health programmes within complex adaptive systems. The aim of this paper is to present an evaluation framework that supports researchers in designing systems evaluations in a comprehensive and practical way.
Methods: We searched the literature for existing public health systems evaluation studies. Key characteristics on how to conduct a systems evaluation were extracted and compared across studies. Next, we overlaid the identified characteristics to the context of the Lifestyle Innovations Based on Youth Knowledge and Experience (LIKE) programme evaluation and analyzed which characteristics were essential to carry out the LIKE evaluation. This resulted in the Evaluation of Programmes in Complex Adaptive Systems (ENCOMPASS) framework.
Results: The ENCOMPASS framework includes five iterative stages: (1) adopting a system dynamics perspective on the overall evaluation design; (2) defining the system boundaries; (3) understanding the pre-existing system to inform system changes; (4) monitoring dynamic programme output at different system levels; and (5) measuring programme outcome and impact in terms of system changes.
Conclusions: The value of ENCOMPASS lies in the integration of key characteristics from existing systems evaluation studies, as well as in its practical, applied focus. It can be employed in evaluating public health programmes in complex adaptive systems. Furthermore, ENCOMPASS provides guidance for the entire evaluation process, all the way from understanding the system to developing actions to change it and to measuring system changes. By the nature of systems thinking, the ENCOMPASS framework will likely evolve further over time, as the field expands with more completed studies.
de Pooter N, Luna Pinzon A, den Hertog K, Altenburg T, Busch V, Dijkstra C Health Res Policy Syst. 2025; 23(1):30.
PMID: 40038671 PMC: 11881247. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-025-01301-3.
Hamilton C, Lewis R, Blake C, Purvis A, Vaczy C, Deidda M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e096596.
PMID: 39956602 PMC: 11831264. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096596.
Beuken M, Kleynen M, Braun S, Van Berkel K, van der Kallen C, Koster A JMIR Med Inform. 2025; 13:e64479.
PMID: 39908080 PMC: 11840370. DOI: 10.2196/64479.
Brinkley A, Cusimano K, Freeman P, Southall-Edwards R, Gladwell V Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025; 22(1):7.
PMID: 39819450 PMC: 11740498. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01688-2.
Maldonado B, Schuerkamp R, Martin C, Rice K, Nataraj N, Brown M Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press). 2024; 12(3):234-260.
PMID: 39664320 PMC: 11633372. DOI: 10.1017/nws.2024.8.