» Articles » PMID: 35346233

The ENCOMPASS Framework: a Practical Guide for the Evaluation of Public Health Programmes in Complex Adaptive Systems

Abstract

Background: Systems thinking embraces the complexity of public health problems, including childhood overweight and obesity. It aids in understanding how factors are interrelated, and it can be targeted to produce favourable changes in a system. There is a growing call for systems approaches in public health research, yet limited practical guidance is available on how to evaluate public health programmes within complex adaptive systems. The aim of this paper is to present an evaluation framework that supports researchers in designing systems evaluations in a comprehensive and practical way.

Methods: We searched the literature for existing public health systems evaluation studies. Key characteristics on how to conduct a systems evaluation were extracted and compared across studies. Next, we overlaid the identified characteristics to the context of the Lifestyle Innovations Based on Youth Knowledge and Experience (LIKE) programme evaluation and analyzed which characteristics were essential to carry out the LIKE evaluation. This resulted in the Evaluation of Programmes in Complex Adaptive Systems (ENCOMPASS) framework.

Results: The ENCOMPASS framework includes five iterative stages: (1) adopting a system dynamics perspective on the overall evaluation design; (2) defining the system boundaries; (3) understanding the pre-existing system to inform system changes; (4) monitoring dynamic programme output at different system levels; and (5) measuring programme outcome and impact in terms of system changes.

Conclusions: The value of ENCOMPASS lies in the integration of key characteristics from existing systems evaluation studies, as well as in its practical, applied focus. It can be employed in evaluating public health programmes in complex adaptive systems. Furthermore, ENCOMPASS provides guidance for the entire evaluation process, all the way from understanding the system to developing actions to change it and to measuring system changes. By the nature of systems thinking, the ENCOMPASS framework will likely evolve further over time, as the field expands with more completed studies.

Citing Articles

Monitoring and adaptation of a system dynamics approach to prevent childhood overweight and obesity: findings from the LIKE programme.

de Pooter N, Luna Pinzon A, den Hertog K, Altenburg T, Busch V, Dijkstra C Health Res Policy Syst. 2025; 23(1):30.

PMID: 40038671 PMC: 11881247. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-025-01301-3.


Evaluating a whole-school approach to addressing gender-based violence in Scottish secondary schools (Equally Safe at School): a study protocol for a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Hamilton C, Lewis R, Blake C, Purvis A, Vaczy C, Deidda M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e096596.

PMID: 39956602 PMC: 11831264. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096596.


Identification of Clusters in a Population With Obesity Using Machine Learning: Secondary Analysis of The Maastricht Study.

Beuken M, Kleynen M, Braun S, Van Berkel K, van der Kallen C, Koster A JMIR Med Inform. 2025; 13:e64479.

PMID: 39908080 PMC: 11840370. DOI: 10.2196/64479.


'It's about collaboration': a whole-systems approach to understanding and promoting movement in Suffolk.

Brinkley A, Cusimano K, Freeman P, Southall-Edwards R, Gladwell V Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025; 22(1):7.

PMID: 39819450 PMC: 11740498. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01688-2.


Guiding prevention initiatives by applying network analysis to systems maps of adverse childhood experiences and adolescent suicide.

Maldonado B, Schuerkamp R, Martin C, Rice K, Nataraj N, Brown M Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press). 2024; 12(3):234-260.

PMID: 39664320 PMC: 11633372. DOI: 10.1017/nws.2024.8.


References
1.
Stansfield J, South J, Mapplethorpe T . What are the elements of a whole system approach to community-centred public health? A qualitative study with public health leaders in England's local authority areas. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(8):e036044. PMC: 7451485. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036044. View

2.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T . Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009; 43(3-4):267-76. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9. View

3.
Waterlander W, Luna Pinzon A, Verhoeff A, den Hertog K, Altenburg T, Dijkstra C . A System Dynamics and Participatory Action Research Approach to Promote Healthy Living and a Healthy Weight among 10-14-Year-Old Adolescents in Amsterdam: The LIKE Programme. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(14). PMC: 7400640. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17144928. View

4.
Karacabeyli D, Allender S, Pinkney S, Amed S . Evaluation of complex community-based childhood obesity prevention interventions. Obes Rev. 2018; 19(8):1080-1092. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12689. View

5.
Foster-Fishman P, Nowell B, Yang H . Putting the system back into systems change: a framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2007; 39(3-4):197-215. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-007-9109-0. View