» Articles » PMID: 35343013

Using Near-term Forecasts and Uncertainty Partitioning to Inform Prediction of Oligotrophic Lake Cyanobacterial Density

Abstract

Near-term ecological forecasts provide resource managers advance notice of changes in ecosystem services, such as fisheries stocks, timber yields, or water quality. Importantly, ecological forecasts can identify where there is uncertainty in the forecasting system, which is necessary to improve forecast skill and guide interpretation of forecast results. Uncertainty partitioning identifies the relative contributions to total forecast variance introduced by different sources, including specification of the model structure, errors in driver data, and estimation of current states (initial conditions). Uncertainty partitioning could be particularly useful in improving forecasts of highly variable cyanobacterial densities, which are difficult to predict and present a persistent challenge for lake managers. As cyanobacteria can produce toxic and unsightly surface scums, advance warning when cyanobacterial densities are increasing could help managers mitigate water quality issues. Here, we fit 13 Bayesian state-space models to evaluate different hypotheses about cyanobacterial densities in a low nutrient lake that experiences sporadic surface scums of the toxin-producing cyanobacterium, Gloeotrichia echinulata. We used data from several summers of weekly cyanobacteria samples to identify dominant sources of uncertainty for near-term (1- to 4-week) forecasts of G. echinulata densities. Water temperature was an important predictor of cyanobacterial densities during model fitting and at the 4-week forecast horizon. However, no physical covariates improved model performance over a simple model including the previous week's densities in 1-week-ahead forecasts. Even the best fit models exhibited large variance in forecasted cyanobacterial densities and did not capture rare peak occurrences, indicating that significant explanatory variables when fitting models to historical data are not always effective for forecasting. Uncertainty partitioning revealed that model process specification and initial conditions dominated forecast uncertainty. These findings indicate that long-term studies of different cyanobacterial life stages and movement in the water column as well as measurements of drivers relevant to different life stages could improve model process representation of cyanobacteria abundance. In addition, improved observation protocols could better define initial conditions and reduce spatial misalignment of environmental data and cyanobacteria observations. Our results emphasize the importance of ecological forecasting principles and uncertainty partitioning to refine and understand predictive capacity across ecosystems.

Citing Articles

What can we learn from 100,000 freshwater forecasts? A synthesis from the NEON Ecological Forecasting Challenge.

Olsson F, Carey C, Boettiger C, Harrison G, Ladwig R, Lapeyrolerie M Ecol Appl. 2025; 35(1):e70004.

PMID: 39936486 PMC: 11816007. DOI: 10.1002/eap.70004.


A framework for developing a real-time lake phytoplankton forecasting system to support water quality management in the face of global change.

Carey C, Calder R, Figueiredo R, Gramacy R, Lofton M, Schreiber M Ambio. 2024; 54(3):475-487.

PMID: 39302615 PMC: 11780027. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-024-02076-7.


Using citizen science data for predicting the timing of ecological phenomena across regions.

Capinha C, Ceia-Hasse A, de-Miguel S, Vila-Vicosa C, Porto M, Jaric I Bioscience. 2024; 74(6):383-392.

PMID: 39055369 PMC: 11266983. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae041.


Understanding the Effect of Different Glucose Concentrations in the Oligotrophic Bacterium BS-G1 through Transcriptomics Analysis.

Chen L, Wang C, Su J Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894061 PMC: 10609351. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102401.


Using near-term forecasts and uncertainty partitioning to inform prediction of oligotrophic lake cyanobacterial density.

Lofton M, Brentrup J, Beck W, Zwart J, Bhattacharya R, Brighenti L Ecol Appl. 2022; 32(5):e2590.

PMID: 35343013 PMC: 9287081. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2590.

References
1.
Clark J, Carpenter S, Barber M, Collins S, Dobson A, Foley J . Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science. 2001; 293(5530):657-60. DOI: 10.1126/science.293.5530.657. View

2.
Dietze M . Prediction in ecology: a first-principles framework. Ecol Appl. 2017; 27(7):2048-2060. DOI: 10.1002/eap.1589. View

3.
Kupper H, Seibert S, Parameswaran A . Fast, sensitive, and inexpensive alternative to analytical pigment HPLC: quantification of chlorophylls and carotenoids in crude extracts by fitting with Gauss peak spectra. Anal Chem. 2007; 79(20):7611-27. DOI: 10.1021/ac070236m. View

4.
Carey C, Ibelings B, Hoffmann E, Hamilton D, Brookes J . Eco-physiological adaptations that favour freshwater cyanobacteria in a changing climate. Water Res. 2012; 46(5):1394-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.016. View

5.
Ozkundakci D, Gsell A, Hintze T, Tauscher H, Adrian R . Winter severity determines functional trait composition of phytoplankton in seasonally ice-covered lakes. Glob Chang Biol. 2015; 22(1):284-98. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13085. View