» Articles » PMID: 35326892

Establishing a New ECMO Referral Center Using an ICU-Based Approach: A Feasibility and Safety Study

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Mar 25
PMID 35326892
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A high-volume center with a multidisciplinary team is regarded as the optimal place for providing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We hypothesize that an ECMO center can also be successfully created and subsequently developed entirely by intensivists in a mid-size mixed intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: A model was created for setting up a new ECMO referral center within the structure of an existing mixed ICU in a tertiary hospital. A retrospective analysis was carried out of the first 33 patients treated in the initial period of the center's activity, from mid 2018 to the end of 2020.

Results: An ECMO center was established and developed entirely based on the resources of an existing mixed ICU. Thirty-three patients were treated. They had an overall survival rate at 90 days of 60.6%. In veno-venous (VV) mode ECMO duration, ICU length of stay, and SOFA score were significantly higher than in veno-arterial mode. No significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed between survivors and non-survivors on VV-ECMO.

Conclusions: A regional ECMO center can be set up as an integral part of a mixed ICU in a tertiary hospital. Extracorporeal therapy, such as continuous renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation can be managed entirely by intensivists. Further studies are needed to show that the ICU-based approach to setting up a new ECMO center is no less effective than the multidisciplinary approach.

Citing Articles

The Jena Method: Perfusionist Independent, Standby Wet-Primed Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Circuit for Immediate Catheterization Laboratory and/or Hybrid Operating Room Deployment.

Haertel F, Kaluza M, Bogoviku J, Westphal J, Fritzenwanger M, Pfeifer R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592110 PMC: 10932279. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051292.


Successful Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Implementation at a Non-tertiary Medical Center: A Single-Center Experience.

Hassani B, Tran T, Hansaliya P, Kelley W, Enfinger R, Nelson D Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e46982.

PMID: 38021723 PMC: 10640913. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46982.


The future of cardiac critical care: an anesthesia perspective.

Tankard K, Shelton K Ann Transl Med. 2023; 11(9):324.

PMID: 37404999 PMC: 10316097. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-4495.

References
1.
Abrams D, Garan A, Abdelbary A, Bacchetta M, Bartlett R, Beck J . Position paper for the organization of ECMO programs for cardiac failure in adults. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(6):717-729. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5064-5. View

2.
DellaVolpe J, Barbaro R, Cannon J, Fan E, Greene W, Gunnerson K . Joint Society of Critical Care Medicine-Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Task Force Position Paper on the Role of the Intensivist in the Initiation and Management of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2020; 48(6):838-846. PMC: 7422732. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004330. View

3.
Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoue S, Guervilly C . Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(21):1965-1975. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800385. View

4.
Na S, Chung C, Choi H, Cho Y, Sung K, Yang J . The effect of multidisciplinary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation team on clinical outcomes in patients with severe acute respiratory failure. Ann Intensive Care. 2018; 8(1):31. PMC: 5826909. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-018-0375-9. View

5.
Shekar K, Badulak J, Peek G, Boeken U, Dalton H, Arora L . Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Coronavirus Disease 2019 Interim Guidelines: A Consensus Document from an International Group of Interdisciplinary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Providers. ASAIO J. 2020; 66(7):707-721. PMC: 7228451. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001193. View