» Articles » PMID: 35326693

Looking for a Simplified Diagnostic Model to Identify Potentially Lethal Cases of Prostate Cancer at Initial Diagnosis: An ImGO Pilot Study

Abstract

The recurrent genetic anomalies used to classify prostate cancer (PC) into distinct molecular subtypes have limited relevance for clinical practice. In consideration of WHO 2016 histological classification, which includes the introduction of Gleason Score 4 for patients with cribriform component and the definition of intraductal carcinoma as a new entity, a retrospective pilot study was conducted to investigate, by histological review, if there were any variations of Gleason Score and the incidence of intraductal carcinoma and cribriform pattern, intended as "phenotypic" markers of potentially lethal PC, among metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) samples. Potentially predictive factors were also assessed. Among 125 cases, a variation in the Gleason Score was reported in 26% of cases. A cribriform (36%) or intraductal (2%) pattern was reported in a higher percentage. Of them, a primary Gleason pattern 4 was reported in 80% of cases. All patients with intraductal carcinoma present a mutation, also found in 80% of cases with a cribriform pattern. This pilot study documented some hypothesis-generating data, as the evaluation of de novo mCSPC and mCRPC as phenotypic/biologic model to be translated in clinical practice. A cribriform pattern/intraductal carcinoma might be a marker of potentially lethal PC. The high incidence of and mutations in de novo mCSPC may also have a therapeutic implication.

Citing Articles

Molecular complexity of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate.

Zhu S, Xu N, Zeng H Cancer Med. 2024; 13(2):e6939.

PMID: 38379333 PMC: 10879723. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6939.


DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Precision Oncology.

Grypari I, Tzelepi V, Gyftopoulos K Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(14).

PMID: 37511177 PMC: 10380086. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411418.


Understanding the Drawbacks of the Current Tumor Staging Systems: How to Improve?.

Giacomelli L, Sacco R, Papa S, Carr B Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 36831584 PMC: 9953973. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041242.


The Expression of Proto-Oncogene () Plays a Central Role in the Oncogenic Mechanism Involved in the Development and Progression of Prostate Cancer.

Kish E, Choudhry M, Gamallat Y, Buharideen S, D D, Bismar T Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(9).

PMID: 35563163 PMC: 9105369. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094772.

References
1.
Dawson N, Zibelman M, Lindsay T, Feldman R, Saul M, Gatalica Z . An Emerging Landscape for Canonical and Actionable Molecular Alterations in Primary and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020; 19(6):1373-1382. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0531. View

2.
Kristiansen G . Markers of clinical utility in the differential diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2018; 31(S1):S143-155. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.168. View

3.
Labrecque M, Coleman I, Brown L, True L, Kollath L, Lakely B . Molecular profiling stratifies diverse phenotypes of treatment-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Invest. 2019; 129(10):4492-4505. PMC: 6763249. DOI: 10.1172/JCI128212. View

4.
Cohen R, Wheeler T, Bonkhoff H, Rubin M . A proposal on the identification, histologic reporting, and implications of intraductal prostatic carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007; 131(7):1103-9. DOI: 10.5858/2007-131-1103-APOTIH. View

5.
VanderWeele D, Antonarakis E, Carducci M, Dreicer R, Fizazi K, Gillessen S . Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Clinical Decision Making in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape of Life-Prolonging Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(32):2961-2967. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01595. View