» Articles » PMID: 31361600

Molecular Profiling Stratifies Diverse Phenotypes of Treatment-refractory Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with diverse drivers of disease progression and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. We conducted deep phenotypic characterization of CRPC metastases and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines using whole genome RNA sequencing, gene set enrichment analysis and immunohistochemistry. Our analyses revealed five mCRPC phenotypes based on the expression of well-characterized androgen receptor (AR) or neuroendocrine (NE) genes: (i) AR-high tumors (ARPC), (ii) AR-low tumors (ARLPC), (iii) amphicrine tumors composed of cells co-expressing AR and NE genes (AMPC), (iv) double-negative tumors (i.e. AR-/NE-; DNPC) and (v) tumors with small cell or NE gene expression without AR activity (SCNPC). RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST) activity, which suppresses NE gene expression, was lost in AMPC and SCNPC PDX models. However, knockdown of REST in cell lines revealed that attenuated REST activity drives the AMPC phenotype but is not sufficient for SCNPC conversion. We also identified a subtype of DNPC tumors with squamous differentiation and generated an encompassing 26-gene transcriptional signature that distinguished the five mCRPC phenotypes. Together, our data highlight the central role of AR and REST in classifying treatment-resistant mCRPC phenotypes. These molecular classifications could potentially guide future therapeutic studies and clinical trial design.

Citing Articles

Defined cellular reprogramming of androgen receptor-active prostate cancer to neuroendocrine prostate cancer.

Li S, Song K, Sun H, Tao Y, Huang A, Bhatia V bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40027790 PMC: 11870442. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.12.637904.


Cell Models of Castration Resistant and High Dose Testosterone-Resistant Prostate Cancer Recapitulate the Heterogeneity of Response Observed in Clinical Practice.

Graham L, Su L, Nicklawsky A, Feng F, Orlicky D, Petraccione J Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40002188 PMC: 11852443. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040593.


Roles and therapeutic potential of the SLC family in prostate cancer-literature review.

Fu Y, Chen J, Zhu X, Ding M, Wang H, Fu S BMC Urol. 2025; 25(1):32.

PMID: 39966814 PMC: 11837367. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-025-01714-w.


Small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer cells with varying neuroendocrine differentiation markers show sensitivity to imipridone ONC201/TIC10.

Ding E, Pinho-Schwermann M, Zhang S, Purcell C, El-Deiry W Am J Transl Res. 2025; 17(1):104-115.

PMID: 39959215 PMC: 11826210. DOI: 10.62347/IBUS3598.


[Aggressive variant prostate cancer and transdifferentiated neuroendocrine prostate cancer: from diagnosis to therapy].

von Amsberg G, Dyshlovoy S, Kaune M Urologie. 2025; 64(3):246-255.

PMID: 39928109 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02511-3.


References
1.
Irshad S, Bansal M, Castillo-Martin M, Zheng T, Aytes A, Wenske S . A molecular signature predictive of indolent prostate cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2013; 5(202):202ra122. PMC: 3943244. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006408. View

2.
Ryan C, Smith M, de Bono J, Molina A, Logothetis C, de Souza P . Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012; 368(2):138-48. PMC: 3683570. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209096. View

3.
Zou M, Toivanen R, Mitrofanova A, Floch N, Hayati S, Sun Y . Transdifferentiation as a Mechanism of Treatment Resistance in a Mouse Model of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017; 7(7):736-749. PMC: 5501744. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1174. View

4.
Aparicio A, Harzstark A, Corn P, Wen S, Araujo J, Tu S . Platinum-based chemotherapy for variant castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19(13):3621-30. PMC: 3699964. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3791. View

5.
Hamada T, Wakamatsu T, Miyahara M, Nagata S, Nomura M, Kamikawa Y . MUC4: a novel prognostic factor of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2011; 130(8):1768-76. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26187. View