» Articles » PMID: 35324744

Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model

Overview
Journal Toxics
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35324744
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper, the emission sources of PM10 are characterised by analysing its trace elements (TE) and ions contents. PM10 samples were collected for a year (2019−2020) at five sites and analysed. PM10 speciated data were analysed using graphical visualization, correlation analysis, generalised additive model (GAM), and positive matrix factorization (PMF). Annual average PM10 concentrations (µg/m3) were 304.68 ± 155.56 at Aziziyah, 219.59 ± 87.29 at Misfalah, 173.90 ± 103.08 at Abdeyah, 168.81 ± 82.50 at Askan, and 157.60 ± 80.10 at Sanaiyah in Makkah, which exceeded WHO (15 µg/m3), USEPA (50 µg/m3), and the Saudi Arabia national (80 µg/m3) annual air quality standards. A GAM model was developed using PM10 as a response and ions and TEs as predictors. Among the predictors Mg, Ca, Cr, Al, and Pb were highly significant (p < 0.01), Se, Cl, and NO2 were significant (p < 0.05), and PO4 and SO4 were significant (p < 0.1). The model showed R-squared (adj) 0.85 and deviance explained 88.1%. PMF identified four main emission sources of PM10 in Makkah: (1) Road traffic emissions (explained 51% variance); (2) Industrial emissions and mineral dust (explained 27.5% variance); (3) Restaurant and dwelling emissions (explained 13.6% variance); and (4) Fossil fuel combustion (explained 7.9% variance).

Citing Articles

Characteristics, potential sources, and cancer risk apportionment of PM-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Bengbu, Central China.

Wu D, Ma Z, Diao H, Wang W, Chen L, Zhou D Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1445782.

PMID: 39583078 PMC: 11582039. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445782.


Sustainable Plasma Gasification Treatment of Plastic Waste: Evaluating Environmental, Economic, and Strategic Dimensions.

Rida Galaly A, Van Oost G, Dawood N ACS Omega. 2024; 9(19):21174-21186.

PMID: 38764658 PMC: 11097155. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c01084.


Energy Recovery and Economic Evaluation for Industrial Fuel from Plastic Waste.

Rida Galaly A, Dawood N Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(11).

PMID: 37299232 PMC: 10255594. DOI: 10.3390/polym15112433.


Heavy Metal Pollution and Source Contributions in Agricultural Soils Developed from Karst Landform in the Southwestern Region of China.

Qin Y, Zhang F, Xue S, Ma T, Yu L Toxics. 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36287848 PMC: 9610029. DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100568.

References
1.
Ryou H, Heo J, Kim S . Source apportionment of PM and PM air pollution, and possible impacts of study characteristics in South Korea. Environ Pollut. 2018; 240:963-972. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.066. View

2.
Simpson I, Aburizaiza O, Siddique A, Barletta B, Blake N, Gartner A . Air quality in Mecca and surrounding holy places in Saudi Arabia during Hajj: initial survey. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(15):8529-37. DOI: 10.1021/es5017476. View

3.
Cowie G, Lawson W, Kim N . Australian dust causing respiratory disease admissions in some North Island, New Zealand hospitals. N Z Med J. 2010; 123(1311):87-8. View

4.
Ramirez O, Sanchez de la Campa A, Amato F, Catacoli R, Rojas N, de la Rosa J . Chemical composition and source apportionment of PM at an urban background site in a high-altitude Latin American megacity (Bogota, Colombia). Environ Pollut. 2017; 233:142-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.045. View

5.
Ali N, Eqani S, Nazar E, Alhakamy N, Rashid M, Shahzad K . Arsenic and lead in the indoor residential settings of different socio-economic status; assessment of human health risk via dust exposure. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020; 28(11):13288-13299. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11546-w. View