» Articles » PMID: 35324643

Psychosocial and Physiological Factors Affecting Selection to Regional Age-Grade Rugby Union Squads: A Machine Learning Approach

Overview
Journal Sports (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35324643
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Talent selection programmes choose athletes for talent development pathways. Currently, the set of psychosocial variables that determine talent selection in youth Rugby Union are unknown, with the literature almost exclusively focusing on physiological variables. The purpose of this study was to use a novel machine learning approach to identify the physiological and psychosocial models that predict selection to a regional age-grade rugby union team. Age-grade club rugby players ( = 104; age, 15.47 ± 0.80; U16, = 62; U18, = 42) were assessed for physiological and psychosocial factors during regional talent selection days. Predictive models (selected vs. non-selected) were created for forwards, backs, and across all players using Bayesian machine learning. The generated physiological models correctly classified 67.55% of all players, 70.09% of forwards, and 62.50% of backs. Greater hand-grip strength, faster 10 m and 40 m sprint, and power were common features for selection. The generated psychosocial models correctly classified 62.26% of all players, 73.66% of forwards, and 60.42% of backs. Reduced burnout, reduced emotional exhaustion, and lower reduced sense of accomplishment, were common features for selection. Selection appears to be predominantly based on greater strength, speed, and power, as well as lower athlete burnout.

Citing Articles

Non-contact lower limb injuries in Rugby Union: A two-year pattern recognition analysis of injury risk factors.

Evans S, Owen R, Whittaker G, Davis O, Jones E, Hardy J PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0307287.

PMID: 39446824 PMC: 11500902. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307287.


The role of morphometric characteristics in predicting 20-meter sprint performance through machine learning.

Kurtoglu A, Eken O, Ciftci R, Car B, Donmez E, Kilicarslan S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16593.

PMID: 39025965 PMC: 11258122. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67405-y.


Special Issue "Talent Identification and Development in Youth Sports".

Kelly A, Calvo A, Dos Santos S, Jimenez Saiz S Sports (Basel). 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36548486 PMC: 9781698. DOI: 10.3390/sports10120189.


A Multidisciplinary Investigation into the Talent Development Processes at an English Football Academy: A Machine Learning Approach.

Kelly A, Williams C, Cook R, Jimenez Saiz S, Wilson M Sports (Basel). 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36287772 PMC: 9611883. DOI: 10.3390/sports10100159.

References
1.
Till K, Cobley S, Hara J, Cooke C, Chapman C . Considering maturation status and relative age in the longitudinal evaluation of junior rugby league players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 24(3):569-76. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12033. View

2.
Jones B, Lawrence G, Hardy L . New evidence of relative age effects in "super-elite" sportsmen: a case for the survival and evolution of the fittest. J Sports Sci. 2017; 36(6):697-703. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1332420. View

3.
Sayers S, Harackiewicz D, Harman E, Frykman P, Rosenstein M . Cross-validation of three jump power equations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31(4):572-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199904000-00013. View

4.
Jones B, Weaving D, Tee J, Darrall-Jones J, Weakley J, Phibbs P . Bigger, stronger, faster, fitter: the differences in physical qualities of school and academy rugby union players. J Sports Sci. 2018; 36(21):2399-2404. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1458589. View

5.
Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M . Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2004; 18(3):551-5. DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)18<551:RAFVOS>2.0.CO;2. View