» Articles » PMID: 29608414

Bigger, Stronger, Faster, Fitter: the Differences in Physical Qualities of School and Academy Rugby Union Players

Overview
Journal J Sports Sci
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Apr 3
PMID 29608414
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Limited research has compared the physical qualities of adolescent rugby union (RU) players across differing playing standards. This study therefore compared the physical qualities of academy and school Under-18 RU players. One-hundred and eighty-four (professional regional academy, n = 55 school, n = 129) male RU players underwent a physical testing battery to quantify height, body mass, strength (bench press and pull-up), speed (10, 20 and 40 m), 10 m momentum (calculated; 10 m velocity * body mass) and a proxy measure of aerobic fitness (Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1; IRTL1). The practical significance of differences between playing levels were assessed using magnitude-based inferences. Academy players were taller (very likely small), heavier (likely moderate) and stronger (bench press possibly large; pull-up plus body mass likely small) than school players. Academy players were faster than school players over 20 and 40 m (possibly and likely small), although differences in 10 m speed were not apparent (possibly trivial). Academy players displayed greater 10 m momentum (likely moderate) and greater IRTL1 performance (likely small) than school players. These findings suggest that body size, strength, running momentum, 40 m speed and aerobic fitness contribute to a higher playing standard in adolescent rugby union.

Citing Articles

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Unresisted vs. Heavy Resisted Sprint Training Programs: Effects on Strength, Jump, Unresisted and Resisted Sprint Performance in Youth Rugby Union Players.

Zabaloy S, Healy R, Pereira L, Tondelli E, Tomaghelli L, Aparicio J J Hum Kinet. 2025; 95:199-214.

PMID: 39944984 PMC: 11812154. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/200121.


A comparative analysis of physical fitness characteristics and rugby-specific game skills of schoolboy players by playing standards: Implications for talent identification programs in resource-constrained settings.

Chiwaridzo M, Mudawarima T, Shumba T, Ferguson G, Smits-Engelsman B S Afr J Sports Med. 2024; 36(1):v36i1a18525.

PMID: 39659440 PMC: 11629942. DOI: 10.17159/2078-516X/2024/v36i1a18525.


Absolute and relative reliability of test battery components assembled for schoolboy rugby players playing competitive rugby in low-resource settings: A pragmatic in-season test-retest approach.

Chiwaridzo M, Tadyanemhandu C, Mkumbuzi N, Dambi J, Ferguson G, Smits-Engelsman B S Afr J Sports Med. 2024; 33(1):v33i1a12220.

PMID: 38390585 PMC: 10883676. DOI: 10.17159/2078-516X/2021/v33i1a12220.


Anthropometric and physical characteristics in U16, U18 and U20 elite French youth rugby union players.

Peeters A, Leduc C, Piscione J, Lacome M, Carling C, Babault N PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295623.

PMID: 38117784 PMC: 10732359. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295623.


Physical fitness in young top level table tennis players: differences between sex, age and playing style.

Pradas de la Fuente F, Toro-Roman V, Ortega-Zayas M, Moreno-Azze A Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1308960.

PMID: 38090039 PMC: 10714006. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1308960.