» Articles » PMID: 35323327

Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Mar 24
PMID 35323327
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Public reimbursement systems face the challenge of balancing provision of needed treatments and the reality of limited resources. Canada has a complex system for drug approval and public reimbursement, with jurisdiction divided between the federal government and the provinces/territories. A pivotal role is that of health technology assessment (HTA), which relies primarily on health economic principles to analyze the value of drugs on a population health basis and make recommendations about public reimbursement. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) provides recommendations to all provinces but Quebec. This article provides an overview of Canada's approval and public reimbursement pathway, including the role of HTA and the economic principles on which it relies. Starting in late 2020, CADTH reduced the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) threshold, the metric relied upon in making recommendations to public payers. An analysis of all 56 oncology drug final recommendations issued from January 2020 to January 2022 was conducted and confirms this reduction in the cost per QALY threshold. As a result of this threshold reduction, recommendations to the provinces include, in a number of cases, substantially greater price reductions. The potential implications for successful price negotiation with the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA), the public negotiating body for the provinces, are discussed.

Citing Articles

Is Canada Moving towards a More Agile Regulatory Approval and Reimbursement Process with a Shifting Role for Real-World Evidence (RWE) for Oncology Drugs?.

Lau C, Rawson N Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(9):5599-5607.

PMID: 39330042 PMC: 11430900. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31090414.


Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health....

Fashami F, Tarride J, Sadeghirad B, Hariri K, Peyrovinasab A, Levine M Pharmacoecon Open. 2024; 8(6):823-836.

PMID: 39103675 PMC: 11499573. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00511-9.


Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.

Rawson N, Stewart D Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024; 16:437-445.

PMID: 38812711 PMC: 11135564. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S462872.


New Anticancer Drugs: Reliably Assessing "Value" While Addressing High Prices.

Stewart D, Bradford J, Sehdev S, Ramsay T, Navani V, Rawson N Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(5):2453-2480.

PMID: 38785465 PMC: 11119944. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050184.


Suitability of the Current Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices: Scoping Literature Review.

Farah L, Borget I, Martelli N, Vallee A J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e51514.

PMID: 38739911 PMC: 11130781. DOI: 10.2196/51514.


References
1.
Skedgel C, Wranik D, Hu M . The Relative Importance of Clinical, Economic, Patient Values and Feasibility Criteria in Cancer Drug Reimbursement in Canada: A Revealed Preferences Analysis of Recommendations of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review 2011-2017. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 36(4):467-475. PMC: 5840198. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0610-0. View

2.
Weinstein M, Torrance G, McGuire A . QALYs: the basics. Value Health. 2009; 12 Suppl 1:S5-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00515.x. View

3.
Pearson S . The ICER Value Framework: Integrating Cost Effectiveness and Affordability in the Assessment of Health Care Value. Value Health. 2018; 21(3):258-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.017. View

4.
Whitehead S, Ali S . Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010; 96:5-21. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldq033. View

5.
Schurer M, Matthijsse S, Vossen C, van Keep M, Horscroft J, Chapman A . Varying Willingness to Pay Based on Severity of Illness: Impact on Health Technology Assessment Outcomes of Inpatient and Outpatient Drug Therapies in The Netherlands. Value Health. 2022; 25(1):91-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.08.003. View