» Articles » PMID: 38739911

Suitability of the Current Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices: Scoping Literature Review

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2024 May 13
PMID 38739911
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based medical devices have garnered attention due to their ability to revolutionize medicine. Their health technology assessment framework is lacking.

Objective: This study aims to analyze the suitability of each health technology assessment (HTA) domain for the assessment of AI-based medical devices.

Methods: We conducted a scoping literature review following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology. We searched databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library), gray literature, and HTA agency websites.

Results: A total of 10.1% (78/775) of the references were included. Data quality and integration are vital aspects to consider when describing and assessing the technical characteristics of AI-based medical devices during an HTA process. When it comes to implementing specialized HTA for AI-based medical devices, several practical challenges and potential barriers could be highlighted and should be taken into account (AI technological evolution timeline, data requirements, complexity and transparency, clinical validation and safety requirements, regulatory and ethical considerations, and economic evaluation).

Conclusions: The adaptation of the HTA process through a methodological framework for AI-based medical devices enhances the comparability of results across different evaluations and jurisdictions. By defining the necessary expertise, the framework supports the development of a skilled workforce capable of conducting robust and reliable HTAs of AI-based medical devices. A comprehensive adapted HTA framework for AI-based medical devices can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and societal impact of AI-based medical devices, guiding their responsible implementation and maximizing their benefits for patients and health care systems.

Citing Articles

AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Jacob C, Brasier N, Laurenzi E, Heuss S, Mougiakakou S, Coltekin A J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e67485.

PMID: 39909417 PMC: 11840377. DOI: 10.2196/67485.


Determinants of Visual Impairment Among Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Risk Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Mao L, Yu Z, Lin L, Sharma M, Song H, Zhao H JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e59810.

PMID: 39382570 PMC: 11481821. DOI: 10.2196/59810.

References
1.
Camara C, Peris-Lopez P, Tapiador J . Security and privacy issues in implantable medical devices: A comprehensive survey. J Biomed Inform. 2015; 55:272-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.04.007. View

2.
Haynes C, Cook G, Jones M . Legal and ethical considerations in processing patient-identifiable data without patient consent: lessons learnt from developing a disease register. J Med Ethics. 2007; 33(5):302-7. PMC: 2598125. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.016907. View

3.
Hordern V . Data Protection Compliance in the Age of Digital Health. Eur J Health Law. 2016; 23(3):248-64. DOI: 10.1163/15718093-12341393. View

4.
Fraser A, Biasin E, Bijnens B, Bruining N, Caiani E, Cobbaert K . Artificial intelligence in medical device software and high-risk medical devices - a review of definitions, expert recommendations and regulatory initiatives. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023; 20(6):467-491. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2184685. View

5.
Park C, Seo S, Kang N, Ko B, Choi B, Park C . Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Current Applications and Issues. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(42):e379. PMC: 7606883. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e379. View