» Articles » PMID: 35316368

Acromioclavicular Joint Suture Button Repair Leads to Coracoclavicular Tunnel Widening

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Biomechanical evaluation of three different suture button devices used in acromioclavicular joint repair and analysis of their effect on post-testing tunnel widening.

Methods: Eighteen human shoulder girdles were assigned into three groups with a similar mean bone mineral density. Three different single-tunnel acromioclavicular repair devices were tested: (1) AC TightRope with FiberWire; (2) AC Dog Bone Button with FiberTape; (3) Low Profile AC Repair System. Biomechanical testing was performed simulating the complex movement of the distal clavicle as follows. A vertical load of 80 N was applied continuously. The rotation of the clavicle about its long axis was set at 10° anterior and 30° posterior for 2500 cycles at 0.25 Hz. The horizontal translation of the clavicle was set at 6 mm medial and 6 mm lateral for 10,000 cycles at 1 Hz. The coracoclavicular distance was measured before and after testing. After testing, each sample underwent micro-CT analysis. Following 3D reconstruction, the area of the bone tunnels was measured at five defined cross sections.

Results: In TightRope and Dog Bone groups, all samples completed testing, whereas in the Low Profile group, three out of six samples showed system failure. The mean absolute difference of coracoclavicular distance after testing was significantly greater in the Low Profile group compared to TightRope and Dog Bone groups (4.3 ± 1.3 mm vs 1.9 ± 0.7 mm vs 1.9 ± 0.8 mm; p = 0.001). Micro-CT analysis of the specimens demonstrated significant tunnel widening in the inferior clavicular and superior coracoid regions in all three groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Significant tunnel widening can be observed for all devices and is primarily found in the inferior parts of the clavicle and superior parts of the coracoid. The Low Profile AC Repair System showed inferior biomechanical properties compared to the AC TightRope and AC Dog Bone devices. Therefore, clinicians should carefully select the type of acromioclavicular repair device used and need to consider tunnel widening as a complication.

Citing Articles

Progressive Loss of Acromioclavicular Joint Reduction Correlated with Progressive Clavicular Tunnel Widening after Coracoclavicular Stabilization in Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Injury.

Maliwankul K, Kanyakool P, Klabklay P, Parinyakhup W, Boonriong T, Chuaychoosakoon C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124713 PMC: 11313541. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154446.


Tendon graft through the coracoid tunnel versus under the coracoid for coracoclavicular/acromioclavicular reconstruction shows no difference in radiographic or patient-reported outcomes.

Ranne J, Kainonen T, Kanto K, Lehtinen J, Niemi P, Scheinin H Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(8):3491-3501.

PMID: 39025979 PMC: 11417077. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05461-9.


No correlation exists between coracoid tunnel widening and loss of reduction after arthroscopic acromioclavicular fixation using tightrope system.

Elkalyoby A, Waly M, Abdelrazek B, Mohamed A, Shohayeb K, Seifeldin A Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(7):2646-2653.

PMID: 36805298 PMC: 10276113. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07329-8.


Evaluation of the coracoid bone tunnel placement on Dog Bone™ button fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a cadaver study combined with finite element analysis.

Gao R, Zhang W, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Hu Y, Wu H BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):18.

PMID: 36624428 PMC: 9827623. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06119-6.

References
1.
Rosso C, Martetschlager F, Saccomanno M, Voss A, Lacheta L, Beitzel K . High degree of consensus achieved regarding diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability among ESA-ESSKA members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 29(7):2325-2332. PMC: 8225517. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06286-w. View

2.
Gowd A, Liu J, Cabarcas B, Cvetanovich G, Garcia G, Manderle B . Current Concepts in the Operative Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative Techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2018; 47(11):2745-2758. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518795147. View

3.
Scheibel M, Droschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N . Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(7):1507-16. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511399379. View

4.
Thangaraju S, Tauber M, Habermeyer P, Martetschlager F . Clavicle and coracoid process periprosthetic fractures as late post-operative complications in arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27(12):3797-3802. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05482-7. View

5.
Singh B, Mohanlal P, Bawale R . Early failure of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using TightRope system. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016; 82(1):119-23. View