» Articles » PMID: 31542815

Coracoid Clavicular Tunnel Angle is Related with Loss of Reduction in a Single-tunnel Coracoclavicular Fixation Using a Dog Bone Button in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Sep 23
PMID 31542815
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Despite the high failure rates of techniques used to maintain the reduction of single-tunnel coracoclavicular (CC) fixation, analyses of the etiology of loss of reduction related to surgical techniques are limited. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the initial coracoclavicular tunnel angle was related to loss of reduction in the single-tunnel technique for AC joint dislocation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic single-tunnel CC suture button fixation according to the initial coracoclavicular tunnel angle.

Methods: Thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic single-tunnel CC suture button fixation for AC joint dislocation from 2014 to 2018 were enrolled. The tunneling-first technique was used in the first 11 patients, while the reduction-first technique was used in the remaining 22 consecutive patients. For clinical assessments, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Korean Shoulder Score (KSS) were recorded. For radiological evaluation, coracoclavicular distance ratio, coracoclavicular tunnel angle, coracoid, and clavicular tunnel widths were measured.

Results: The ASES score did not differ significantly between the two groups (n.s.). However, the KSS was significantly better in the reduction-first group (p = 0.031). No significant intergroup differences were observed in the pre- and postoperative coracoclavicular distance ratio. However, at the last follow-up, loss of coracoclavicular distance ratio was significantly smaller in the reduction-first group (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, loss of the coracoclavicular distance ratio was positively correlated with the postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle (p < 0.001, Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.602). The final follow-up clavicular tunnel width was also significantly smaller in the reduction-first group (p = 0.002). Finally, the last follow-up clavicular tunnel width was positively correlated with the postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle (p = 0.008, Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.459).

Conclusion: The reduction-first technique showed better clinical and radiological outcomes than the tunneling-first technique in single-tunnel CC fixation for AC joint dislocation. A large postoperative coracoclavicular tunnel angle was associated with loss of reduction and clavicular tunnel widening. Therefore, obtaining a straight coracoclavicular tunnel angle is crucial for achieving better outcomes and minimizing loss of reduction.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of arthroscopic coracoclavicular management for acromioclavicular joint injuries: A systematic review.

Shah R, Gohal C, Plantz M, Erickson B, Khan M, Tjong V J Orthop. 2024; 59:13-21.

PMID: 39351273 PMC: 11439535. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.07.015.


Progressive Loss of Acromioclavicular Joint Reduction Correlated with Progressive Clavicular Tunnel Widening after Coracoclavicular Stabilization in Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Injury.

Maliwankul K, Kanyakool P, Klabklay P, Parinyakhup W, Boonriong T, Chuaychoosakoon C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15).

PMID: 39124713 PMC: 11313541. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154446.


Medial placement of trapezoid tunnel leads to higher reduction loss in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with anatomic coracoclavicular fixation.

Rojas J, Oyarzun A, Munoz J, Garcia de la Pastora D, Canals A, Viacava A Shoulder Elbow. 2024; 16(3):265-273.

PMID: 38818098 PMC: 11135191. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231170322.


Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review.

Sonnier J, Kemler B, Coladonato C, Paul R, Tjoumakaris F, Freedman K JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 3(1):10-20.

PMID: 37588062 PMC: 10426581. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002.


Criteria for return to play after operative management of acromioclavicular joint separation: a systematic review.

Gawel R, DAmore T, Otlans P, Rao S, Cohen S, Ciccotti M JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 2(2):140-148.

PMID: 37587962 PMC: 10426690. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.11.005.


References
1.
Mazzocca A, Arciero R, Bicos J . Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(2):316-29. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506298022. View

2.
Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Chowaniec D, Niver G, Nowak M, Hanypsiak B . Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(10):2218-25. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511416784. View

3.
Shin S, Kim N . Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single adjustable-loop-length suspensory fixation device in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2014; 31(5):816-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.013. View

4.
Scheibel M, Droschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N . Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(7):1507-16. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511399379. View

5.
Seo J, Heo K, Kim S, Jung J, Yoo J . Arthroscopic Acromioclavicular Fixation With Suture Tape Augmentation After Coracoclavicular Fixation With Dog Bone Button: Surgical Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2018; 7(11):e1197-e1203. PMC: 6261742. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2018.08.005. View