» Articles » PMID: 35315433

Massively Parallel Reporter Perturbation Assays Uncover Temporal Regulatory Architecture During Neural Differentiation

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Mar 22
PMID 35315433
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gene regulatory elements play a key role in orchestrating gene expression during cellular differentiation, but what determines their function over time remains largely unknown. Here, we perform perturbation-based massively parallel reporter assays at seven early time points of neural differentiation to systematically characterize how regulatory elements and motifs within them guide cellular differentiation. By perturbing over 2,000 putative DNA binding motifs in active regulatory regions, we delineate four categories of functional elements, and observe that activity direction is mostly determined by the sequence itself, while the magnitude of effect depends on the cellular environment. We also find that fine-tuning transcription rates is often achieved by a combined activity of adjacent activating and repressing elements. Our work provides a blueprint for the sequence components needed to induce different transcriptional patterns in general and specifically during neural differentiation.

Citing Articles

Predictive Modeling of Gene Expression and Localization of DNA Binding Site Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Karshenas A, Roschinger T, Garcia H bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39763851 PMC: 11702772. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.17.629042.


Functional dissection of metabolic trait-associated gene regulation in steady state and stimulated human skeletal muscle cells.

Nishino K, Kitzman J, Parker S, Tovar A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39677760 PMC: 11642805. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.28.625886.


Just a SNP away: The future of massively parallel reporter assay.

Degner K, Bell J, Jones S, Won H Cell Insight. 2024; 4(1):100214.

PMID: 39618480 PMC: 11607654. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellin.2024.100214.


Network Analysis of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions Highlights Cell-Type-Specific Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation Variation.

Koesterich J, Liu J, Williams S, Yang N, Kreimer A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(18).

PMID: 39337329 PMC: 11432627. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25189840.


Prediction of Enhancer-Gene Interactions Using Chromatin-Conformation Capture and Epigenome Data Using STARE.

Hecker D, Schulz M Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2856:327-339.

PMID: 39283462 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4136-1_20.


References
1.
Schoenfelder S, Fraser P . Long-range enhancer-promoter contacts in gene expression control. Nat Rev Genet. 2019; 20(8):437-455. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0. View

2.
Maurano M, Humbert R, Rynes E, Thurman R, Haugen E, Wang H . Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science. 2012; 337(6099):1190-5. PMC: 3771521. DOI: 10.1126/science.1222794. View

3.
Kearns N, Pham H, Tabak B, Genga R, Silverstein N, Garber M . Functional annotation of native enhancers with a Cas9-histone demethylase fusion. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(5):401-403. PMC: 4414811. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3325. View

4.
Korkmaz G, Lopes R, Ugalde A, Nevedomskaya E, Han R, Myacheva K . Functional genetic screens for enhancer elements in the human genome using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(2):192-8. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3450. View

5.
Inoue F, Ahituv N . Decoding enhancers using massively parallel reporter assays. Genomics. 2015; 106(3):159-164. PMC: 4540663. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.06.005. View