» Articles » PMID: 35314590

Nuclear Expression of P-STAT3 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in ER(-) Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Clin Pract
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Mar 22
PMID 35314590
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) has been reported in several types of cancer, where it acts as an oncogene. However, in breast cancer, the clinical role of STAT3 remains unclear. In the present study, the association between phosphorylated-STAT3 (p-STAT3) expression and clinicopathological/biological factors was examined in each subtype. p-STAT3 expression was examined in 135 cases of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. p-STAT3 expression was not associated with clinicopathological/biological factors and prognosis in a complete cohort of breast cancer cases. However, in patients with estrogen receptor-negative (ER(-)) breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), multivariate analysis showed that higher p-STAT3 expression was significantly associated with a short relapse-free survival ( = 0.029, HR 5.37, 95%CI 1.19-24.29). TNBC patients with p-STAT3 overexpression were found to have a poor prognosis ( = 0.029, HR 5.37, 95%CI 1.19-24.29). On the other hand, in ER(+) breast cancer, p-STAT3 overexpression was associated with a favorable prognosis ( = 0.034, HR 9.48, 95%CI 1.18-76.21). The present results suggested that STAT3 expression may play a different role in ER(-) and ER(+) breast cancer. In the future, the pharmacological inhibition of STAT3 expression may serve as an effective therapeutic strategy for ER(-) breast cancer, particularly TNBC.

Citing Articles

Molecular pathways and targeted therapies in head and neck cancers pathogenesis.

Constantin M, Chifiriuc M, Bleotu C, Vrancianu C, Cristian R, Bertesteanu S Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1373821.

PMID: 38952548 PMC: 11215092. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1373821.


RNAi mediated silencing of STAT3/PD-L1 in tumor-associated immune cells induces robust anti-tumor effects in immunotherapy resistant tumors.

Ganesh S, Kim M, Lee J, Feng X, Ule K, Mahan A Mol Ther. 2024; 32(6):1895-1916.

PMID: 38549376 PMC: 11184339. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.03.035.


Accessing Apoptosis Induction and Metastasis Inhibition Effect of Magnolol on Triple Negative Breast Cancer .

Li Y, Wong C, Hsu F, Chen J, Yang C, Liu H In Vivo. 2023; 37(3):1028-1036.

PMID: 37103080 PMC: 10188043. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13177.


STAT family of transcription factors in breast cancer: Pathogenesis and therapeutic opportunities and challenges.

Wong G, Manore S, Doheny D, Lo H Semin Cancer Biol. 2022; 86(Pt 3):84-106.

PMID: 35995341 PMC: 9714692. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.08.003.


c-Kit Induces Migration of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells and Is a Promising Target for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment.

Lopez-Mejia J, Tallabs-Utrilla L, Salazar-Sojo P, Mantilla-Ollarves J, Sanchez-Carballido M, Rocha-Zavaleta L Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(15).

PMID: 35955836 PMC: 9369219. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158702.

References
1.
Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron J, Nobel A . Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(14):8418-23. PMC: 166244. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0932692100. View

2.
Bowman T, Garcia R, Turkson J, Jove R . STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2000; 19(21):2474-88. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203527. View

3.
Walker S, Nelson E, Zou L, Chaudhury M, Signoretti S, Richardson A . Reciprocal effects of STAT5 and STAT3 in breast cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2009; 7(6):966-76. DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0238. View

4.
Niu G, Wright K, Huang M, Song L, Haura E, Turkson J . Constitutive Stat3 activity up-regulates VEGF expression and tumor angiogenesis. Oncogene. 2002; 21(13):2000-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205260. View

5.
Jiang R, Jin Z, Liu Z, Sun L, Wang L, Li K . Correlation of activated STAT3 expression with clinicopathologic features in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Diagn Ther. 2012; 15(6):347-52. DOI: 10.1007/BF03256470. View