» Articles » PMID: 35314485

Evaluation of a Health and Social Care Programme to Improve Outcomes Following Critical Illness: a Multicentre Study

Abstract

Rationale: At present, clinicians aiming to support patients through the challenges after critical care have limited evidence to base interventions.

Objectives: Evaluate a multicentre integrated health and social care intervention for critical care survivors. A process evaluation assessed factors influencing the programme implementation.

Methods: This study evaluated the impact of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) programme. We compared patients who attended this programme with a usual care cohort from the same time period across nine hospital sites in Scotland. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured via the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument, at 12 months post hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain.

Results: 137 patients who received the InS:PIRE intervention completed outcome measures at 12 months. In the usual care cohort, 115 patients completed the measures. The two cohorts had similar baseline demographics. After adjustment, there was a significant absolute increase in HRQoL in the intervention cohort in relation to the usual care cohort (0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.20, 0.01). Patients in the InS:PIRE cohort also reported self-efficacy scores that were 7.7% higher (2.32 points higher, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.31, =0.02), fewer symptoms of depression (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.76, p=0.01) and similar symptoms of anxiety (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.13, =0.11). There was no significant difference in overall pain experience. Key facilitators for implementation were: integration with inpatient care, organisational engagement, flexibility to service inclusion; key barriers were: funding, staff availability and venue availability.

Conclusions: This multicentre evaluation of a health and social care programme designed for survivors of critical illness appears to show benefit at 12 months following hospital discharge.

Citing Articles

Factors to consider when designing post-hospital interventions to support critical illness recovery: Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.

Stewart J, Pauley E, Wilson D, Bradley J, Hart N, McAuley D J Intensive Care Soc. 2025; 26(1):80-95.

PMID: 39758281 PMC: 11699563. DOI: 10.1177/17511437241308674.


[Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: functional impairments of critical illness survivors].

Paul N, Weiss B Anaesthesiologie. 2024; 74(1):3-14.

PMID: 39680127 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-024-01483-5.


Association Between Caregiver Strain and Emergency Health Care Resource Utilization in Survivors of Critical Illness.

Docherty C, Shaw M, Chim C, MacTavish P, Devine H, OBrien P Chest. 2024; 167(3):768-771.

PMID: 39368736 PMC: 11882738. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.057.


How are Long-Covid, Post-Sepsis-Syndrome and Post-Intensive-Care-Syndrome related? A conceptional approach based on the current research literature.

Fleischmann-Struzek C, Joost F, Pletz M, Weiss B, Paul N, Wesley Ely E Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):283.

PMID: 39210399 PMC: 11363639. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05076-x.


Establishing an artificial intelligence-based predictive model for long-term health-related quality of life for infected patients in the ICU.

Zhang Y, Pan S, Hu Y, Ling B, Hua T, Tang L Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e35521.

PMID: 39170285 PMC: 11336746. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35521.


References
1.
Vincent E, Sewell L, Wagg K, Deacon S, Williams J, Singh S . Measuring a change in self-efficacy following pulmonary rehabilitation: an evaluation of the PRAISE tool. Chest. 2011; 140(6):1534-1539. DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-2649. View

2.
DCruz R, Perrin F, Birring S, Patel A, Patel I, Jolley C . Provision of holistic care after severe COVID-19 pneumonia: anticipating clinical need and managing resources. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(12):1175-1176. PMC: 7834100. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30529-4. View

3.
Cuthbertson B, RATTRAY J, Campbell M, Gager M, Roughton S, Smith A . The PRaCTICaL study of nurse led, intensive care follow-up programmes for improving long term outcomes from critical illness: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009; 339:b3723. PMC: 2763078. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b3723. View

4.
Milton A, Schandl A, Soliman I, Meijers K, van den Boogaard M, Larsson I . Development of an ICU discharge instrument predicting psychological morbidity: a multinational study. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(12):2038-2047. PMC: 6280826. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5467-3. View

5.
Schofield-Robinson O, Lewis S, Smith A, McPeake J, Alderson P . Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 11:CD012701. PMC: 6517170. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012701.pub2. View