» Articles » PMID: 35311614

Dietary Experience with Glucose and Fructose Fosters Heightened Avidity for Glucose-containing Sugars Independent of TRPM5 Taste Transduction in Mice

Overview
Journal Nutr Neurosci
Date 2022 Mar 21
PMID 35311614
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Experience with metabolically distinct sugars, glucose and fructose, enhances attraction to the orosensory properties of glucose over fructose. To gain insight into which sensory signals are affected, we investigated how this nutritive learning reshapes behavioral responding to various sugars in brief access taste tests in C57BL6/J (B6) mice and assessed whether sugar-exposed mice lacking the TRPM5 channel involved in G-protein coupled taste transduction could acquire these types of preferences for glucose-containing sugars.

Methods: B6, TRPM5 knockout (KO), and TRPM5 heterozygous (Het) mice were given extensive access to water (sugar naïve) or 0.316, 0.56, and 1.1 M glucose and fructose (sugar-exposed) and then tested, whilst food deprived, for their relative avidities for glucose, fructose, sucrose, maltose, and/or a non-metabolizable glucose analog in a series of taste tests.

Results: Sugar-exposed B6 mice licked relatively more for glucose than fructose, driven by an increased avidity for glucose, not an avoidance of fructose, and licked more for maltose, compared to their sugar-naïve counterparts. Sugar-exposed B6 mice did not lick with such avidity for a non-metabolizable glucose analog. TRPM5 KO mice took longer to acquire the sugar discrimination than the Het controls, but both groups ultimately licked significantly more for glucose than fructose. Het mice displayed clear preferential licking for sucrose over fructose, while licking comparably high for glucose, sucrose, and maltose. KO mice licked significantly more for maltose than sucrose.

Conclusions: Collectively, the findings suggest that ingestive experience with glucose and fructose primarily reprograms behavioral responding to a TRPM5-independent orosensory signal generated by glucose-containing sugars.

Citing Articles

Selective increases in taste sensitivity to glucose as a function of hunger status.

Martin L, Lim J Appetite. 2025; 207:107901.

PMID: 39933656 PMC: 11884995. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.107901.


TRPM4 and PLCβ3 contribute to normal behavioral responses to an array of sweeteners and carbohydrates but PLCβ3 is not needed for taste-driven licking for glucose.

Gutierrez V, Martin L, Simental-Ramos A, James K, Medler K, Schier L Chem Senses. 2024; 49.

PMID: 38183495 PMC: 10825839. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjae001.


The elusive cephalic phase insulin response: triggers, mechanisms, and functions.

Langhans W, Watts A, Spector A Physiol Rev. 2022; 103(2):1423-1485.

PMID: 36422994 PMC: 9942918. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2022.

References
1.
Spector A, Markison S, St John S, GARCEA M . Sucrose vs. maltose taste discrimination by rats depends on the input of the seventh cranial nerve. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272(4 Pt 2):R1210-8. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1997.272.4.R1210. View

2.
Liman E . TRPM5 and taste transduction. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2007; (179):287-98. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-34891-7_17. View

3.
Breslin P, Izumi A, Tharp A, Ohkuri T, Yokoo Y, Flammer L . Evidence that human oral glucose detection involves a sweet taste pathway and a glucose transporter pathway. PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0256989. PMC: 8494309. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256989. View

4.
Spector A, Schier L . Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms. Appetite. 2016; 122:26-31. PMC: 5484755. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.12.031. View

5.
Montmayeur J, Liberles S, Matsunami H, Buck L . A candidate taste receptor gene near a sweet taste locus. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(5):492-8. DOI: 10.1038/87440. View