» Articles » PMID: 35310311

Far Migration of an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device from the Uterus to the Small Bowel

Overview
Journal Clin Case Rep
Date 2022 Mar 21
PMID 35310311
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A sexually active, asymptomatic 44-year-old presented for Intrauterine device (IUD) removal that had been in place for 13 years. IUD removal was unsuccessful as the strings could not be located. Imaging revealed an extrauterine IUD and at surgical removal of the abdominal IUD a small bowel perforation requiring bowel resection was required. Uterine perforation is a rare complication of IUD use occurring in approximately 1-1.3 in 1000. Risk factors for perforation include provider inexperience, retroverted uterus, immobile uterus, and myometrial defect from a previous cesarean delivery or myomectomy.

Citing Articles

Intrauterine device (IUD) migration to the fallopian tube: a rare location for a translocated IUD with no visceral injury.

Wangwe P, Awadh N, Angelus M Contracept Reprod Med. 2024; 9(1):36.

PMID: 39054493 PMC: 11270885. DOI: 10.1186/s40834-024-00278-8.


Pregnancy with Intrauterine Device Perforation: A Case Report.

Zare S, Sohrabi R, Sohrabi H Int J Fertil Steril. 2023; 18(1):91-93.

PMID: 38041466 PMC: 10692752. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.1974526.1402.


Case report: An intrauterine device hugging the musculus rectus abdominis through the center of a cesarean scar.

Jing J Front Surg. 2023; 9:956856.

PMID: 36684317 PMC: 9852525. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.956856.


Far migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device from the uterus to the small bowel.

Carroll A, Paradise C, Schuemann K, Schellhammer S, Carlan S Clin Case Rep. 2022; 10(3):e05589.

PMID: 35310311 PMC: 8918466. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5589.

References
1.
Morch L, Skovlund C, Hannaford P, Iversen L, Fielding S, Lidegaard O . Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(23):2228-2239. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700732. View

2.
Aydogdu O, Pulat H . Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: A rare entity. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012; 6(3):E134-6. PMC: 3377742. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.11100. View

3.
Aoun J, Dines V, Stovall D, Mete M, Nelson C, Gomez-Lobo V . Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(3):585-592. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000144. View

4.
Boortz H, Margolis D, Ragavendra N, Patel M, Kadell B . Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care. Radiographics. 2012; 32(2):335-52. DOI: 10.1148/rg.322115068. View

5.
Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, Lahteenmaki P, Heikinheimo O . Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(6):1546-51. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det074. View