» Articles » PMID: 35300308

GAFF/IPolQ-Mod+LJ-Fit: Optimized Force Field Parameters for Solvation Free Energy Predictions

Overview
Journal ADMET DMPK
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 Mar 18
PMID 35300308
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rational drug design featuring explicit solubility considerations can greatly benefit from molecular dynamics simulations, as they allow for the prediction of the Gibbs free energy of solvation and thus relative solubilities. In our previous work (A. Mecklenfeld, G. Raabe. J. Chem. Theory Comput. no. 12 (2017) 6266-6274), we have compared solvation free energy results obtained with the General Amber Force Field (GAFF) and its default restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) partial charges to those obtained by modified implicitly polarized charges (IPolQ-Mod) for an implicit representation of impactful polarization effects. In this work, we have adapted Lennard-Jones parameters for GAFF atom types in combination with IPolQ-Mod to further improve the accuracies of solvation free energy and liquid density predictions. We thereby focus on prominent atom types in common drugs. For the refitting, 357 respectively 384 systems were considered for free energies and densities and validation was performed for 142 free energies and 100 densities of binary mixtures. By the in-depth comparison of simulation results for default GAFF, GAFF with IPolQ-Mod and our new set of parameters, which we label GAFF/IPolQ-Mod+LJ-Fit, we can clearly highlight the improvements of our new model for the description of both relative solubilities and fluid phase behaviour.

Citing Articles

Flavones in pomelo peel resist fibril formation of human islet amyloid polypeptide.

Gao C, Wan Z, Liu Y, Meng Y, Chen X, Tang X Chin Herb Med. 2025; 17(1):166-177.

PMID: 39949806 PMC: 11814264. DOI: 10.1016/j.chmed.2024.02.002.


Prediction of toluene/water partition coefficients of SAMPL9 compounds: comparison of the molecular dynamics force fields GAFF/RESP and GAFF/IPolQ-Mod + LJ-fit.

Sprick M, Raabe G Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2024; 26(4):3126-3138.

PMID: 38189577 PMC: 10806620. DOI: 10.1039/d3cp04149b.


Strategies of solubility enhancement and perspectives in solubility measurements of pharmaceutical compounds.

Bergstrom C, Llinas A ADMET DMPK. 2022; 8(3):176-179.

PMID: 35300302 PMC: 8915603. DOI: 10.5599/admet.910.

References
1.
van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark A, Berendsen H . GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem. 2005; 26(16):1701-18. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20291. View

2.
Wang L, Martinez T, Pande V . Building Force Fields: An Automatic, Systematic, and Reproducible Approach. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015; 5(11):1885-91. PMC: 9649520. DOI: 10.1021/jz500737m. View

3.
Klimovich P, Shirts M, Mobley D . Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2015; 29(5):397-411. PMC: 4420631. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-015-9840-9. View

4.
Vanommeslaeghe K, Hatcher E, Acharya C, Kundu S, Zhong S, Shim J . CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J Comput Chem. 2009; 31(4):671-90. PMC: 2888302. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21367. View

5.
Martinez L, Andrade R, Birgin E, Martinez J . PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2009; 30(13):2157-64. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21224. View