» Articles » PMID: 14634989

CHARMM Fluctuating Charge Force Field for Proteins: I Parameterization and Application to Bulk Organic Liquid Simulations

Overview
Journal J Comput Chem
Publisher Wiley
Specialties Biology
Chemistry
Date 2003 Nov 25
PMID 14634989
Citations 137
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A first-generation fluctuating charge (FQ) force field to be ultimately applied for protein simulations is presented. The electrostatic model parameters, the atomic hardnesses, and electronegativities, are parameterized by fitting to DFT-based charge responses of small molecules perturbed by a dipolar probe mimicking a water dipole. The nonbonded parameters for atoms based on the CHARMM atom-typing scheme are determined via simultaneously optimizing vacuum water-solute geometries and energies (for a set of small organic molecules) and condensed phase properties (densities and vaporization enthalpies) for pure bulk liquids. Vacuum solute-water geometries, specifically hydrogen bond distances, are fit to 0.19 A r.m.s. error, while dimerization energies are fit to 0.98 kcal/mol r.m.s. error. Properties of the liquids studied include bulk liquid structure and polarization. The FQ model does indeed show a condensed phase effect in the shifting of molecular dipole moments to higher values relative to the gas phase. The FQ liquids also appear to be more strongly associated, in the case of hydrogen bonding liquids, due to the enhanced dipolar interactions as evidenced by shifts toward lower energies in pair energy distributions. We present results from a short simulation of NMA in bulk TIP4P-FQ water as a step towards simulating solvated peptide/protein systems. As expected, there is a nontrivial dipole moment enhancement of the NMA (although the quantitative accuracy is difficult to assess). Furthermore, the distribution of dipole moments of water molecules in the vicinity of the solutes is shifted towards larger values by 0.1-0.2 Debye in keeping with previously reported work.

Citing Articles

Refinement of Atomic Polarizabilities for a Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Force Field with Simultaneous Considerations of Both Molecular Polarizability Tensors and In-Solution Electrostatic Potentials.

Duan Y, Wang J, Cieplak P, Luo R J Chem Inf Model. 2025; 65(3):1428-1440.

PMID: 39865620 PMC: 11815842. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02175.


Balancing Group 1 Monoatomic Ion-Polar Compound Interactions in the Polarizable Drude Force Field: Application in Protein and Nucleic Acid Systems.

Nan Y, Baral P, Orr A, Michel H, Lemkul J, MacKerell Jr A J Phys Chem B. 2024; 128(49):12078-12091.

PMID: 39625472 PMC: 11646484. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c06354.


CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed.

Hwang W, Austin S, Blondel A, Boittier E, Boresch S, Buck M J Phys Chem B. 2024; 128(41):9976-10042.

PMID: 39303207 PMC: 11492285. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04100.


Evaluating Polarizable Biomembrane Simulations against Experiments.

Antila H, Dixit S, Kav B, Madsen J, Miettinen M, Ollila O J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(10):4325-4337.

PMID: 38718349 PMC: 11137822. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01333.


Assessment of Amino Acid Electrostatic Parametrizations of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.

Zhao S, Cieplak P, Duan Y, Luo R J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(5):2098-2110.

PMID: 38394331 PMC: 11060985. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01347.