Rice Genotypes Express Compensatory Root Growth With Altered Root Distributions in Response to Root Cutting

Overview

Journal Front Plant Sci

Date 2022 Mar 17

PMID 35295630

Authors

Tsubasa Kawai

Yinglong Chen

Hirokazu Takahashi

Yoshiaki Inukai

Kadambot H M Siddique

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Root systems play a pivotal role in water and nutrient uptake from soil. Lateral root (LR) growth is promoted to compensate for inhibited main root growth. Compensatory LR growth contributes to maintaining total root length (TRL) and hence water and nutrient uptake in compacted soils. However, it remains unclear how shoot and root phenotypic traits change during the compensatory growth and whether there are genotypic variations in compensatory root growth. This study analyzed shoot and root morphological traits of 20 rice genotypes, which includes mutants with altered root morphology, during the vegetative stage using a semihydroponic phenotyping system. The phenotyping experiment detected large variation in root and shoot traits among the 20 genotypes. Morphological changes induced by root cutting were analyzed in six selected genotypes with contrasting root system architecture. Root cutting significantly affected root distribution along vertical sections and among diameter classes. After root cutting, more roots distributed at shallower depth and thicker LRs developed. Furthermore, genotypes with deeper root growth without root cutting allocated more compensatory roots to deeper sections even after root cutting than the genotypes with shallower rooting. Due to the compensatory LR growth, root cutting did not significantly affect TRL, root dry weight (RDW), or shoot dry weight (SDW). To analyze the interaction between crown root (CR) number and compensatory root growth, we removed half of the newly emerged CRs in two genotypes. TRL of YRL38 increased at depth with CR number manipulation (CRM) regardless of root tip excision, which was attributed to an increase in specific root length (SRL), despite no change in RDW. Taken together, the tested rice genotypes exhibited compensatory root growth by changing root distribution at depth and in diameter classes. Reducing CR number promoted root development and compensatory growth by improving the efficiency of root development [root length (RL) per resource investment].

Citing Articles

The agronomic mechanism of root lodging resistance and yield stability for sweet corn in response to planting density and nitrogen rates at different planting dates.

Liang Q, Chang H, Chen H, Wu Q, Qin Y, Wang Z Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1481033.

PMID: 40007958 PMC: 11850264. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1481033.

Agronomic performance and remote sensing assessment of organic and mineral fertilization in rice fields.

Marti-Jerez K, Catala-Forner M, Tomas N, Murillo G, Ortiz C, Sanchez-Torres M Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1230012.

PMID: 37860263 PMC: 10582757. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1230012.

Root pruning improves maize water-use efficiency by root water absorption.

Yan M, Zhang C, Li H, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Y Front Plant Sci. 2023; 13:1023088.

PMID: 36684736 PMC: 9845614. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1023088.

Auxin Distribution in Lateral Root Primordium Development Affects the Size and Lateral Root Diameter of Rice.

Kawai T, Akahoshi R, Shelley I, Kojima T, Sato M, Tsuji H Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:834378.

PMID: 35498720 PMC: 9043952. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.834378.

References

Inukai Y, Sakamoto T, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Shibata Y, Gomi K, Umemura I . Crown rootless1, which is essential for crown root formation in rice, is a target of an AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR in auxin signaling. Plant Cell. 2005; 17(5):1387-96. PMC: 1091762. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.105.030981. View

Chen Y, Dunbabin V, Diggle A, Siddique K, Rengel Z . Development of a novel semi-hydroponic phenotyping system for studying root architecture. Funct Plant Biol. 2020; 38(5):355-363. DOI: 10.1071/FP10241. View

Robinson D . The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytol. 2021; 127(4):635-674. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb02969.x. View

Montagu K, Conroy J, Atwell B . The position of localized soil compaction determines root and subsequent shoot growth responses. J Exp Bot. 2001; 52(364):2127-33. DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/52.364.2127. View

Avramova V, Nagel K, AbdElgawad H, Bustos D, DuPlessis M, Fiorani F . Screening for drought tolerance of maize hybrids by multi-scale analysis of root and shoot traits at the seedling stage. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67(8):2453-66. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw055. View

Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S, Rane J, Ishitani M, Hara N . Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(9):1097-102. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2725. View

Chen Y, Palta J, Prasad P, Siddique K . Phenotypic variability in bread wheat root systems at the early vegetative stage. BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20(1):185. PMC: 7189723. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02390-8. View

Xu D, Miao J, Yumoto E, Yokota T, Asahina M, Watahiki M . YUCCA9-Mediated Auxin Biosynthesis and Polar Auxin Transport Synergistically Regulate Regeneration of Root Systems Following Root Cutting. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017; 58(10):1710-1723. PMC: 5921505. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcx107. View

Rogers E, Benfey P . Regulation of plant root system architecture: implications for crop advancement. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014; 32:93-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.015. View

10.

Correa J, Postma J, Watt M, Wojciechowski T . Soil compaction and the architectural plasticity of root systems. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70(21):6019-6034. PMC: 6859514. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz383. View

11.

Bengough A, Bransby M, Hans J, McKenna S, Roberts T, Valentine T . Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell. J Exp Bot. 2005; 57(2):437-47. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erj003. View

12.

Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P . Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J. 2008; 50(3):346-63. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200810425. View

13.

Chen Y, Shan F, Nelson M, Siddique K, Rengel Z . Root trait diversity, molecular marker diversity, and trait-marker associations in a core collection of Lupinus angustifolius. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67(12):3683-97. PMC: 4896361. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw127. View

14.

Lucob-Agustin N, Kawai T, Kano-Nakata M, Suralta R, Niones J, Hasegawa T . Morpho-physiological and molecular mechanisms of phenotypic root plasticity for rice adaptation to water stress conditions. Breed Sci. 2021; 71(1):20-29. PMC: 7973496. DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.20106. View

15.

Fanello D, Kelly S, Bartoli C, Cano M, Martinez Alonso S, Guiamet J . Plasticity of root growth and respiratory activity: Root responses to above-ground senescence, fruit removal or partial root pruning in soybean. Plant Sci. 2019; 290:110296. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110296. View

16.

Haling R, Simpson R, Culvenor R, Lambers H, Richardson A . Effect of soil acidity, soil strength and macropores on root growth and morphology of perennial grass species differing in acid-soil resistance. Plant Cell Environ. 2010; 34(3):444-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02254.x. View

17.

Kawai T, Shibata K, Akahoshi R, Nishiuchi S, Takahashi H, Nakazono M . family genes in rice control lateral root primordium size. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(1). PMC: 8740593. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101846119. View

18.

Sun B, Gao Y, Lynch J . Large Crown Root Number Improves Topsoil Foraging and Phosphorus Acquisition. Plant Physiol. 2018; 177(1):90-104. PMC: 5933112. DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00234. View

19.

Uga Y . Challenges to design-oriented breeding of root system architecture adapted to climate change. Breed Sci. 2021; 71(1):3-12. PMC: 7973499. DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.20118. View

20.

Guo H, York L . Maize with fewer nodal roots allocates mass to more lateral and deep roots that improve nitrogen uptake and shoot growth. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70(19):5299-5309. PMC: 6793442. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz258. View