» Articles » PMID: 36684736

Root Pruning Improves Maize Water-use Efficiency by Root Water Absorption

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2023 Jan 23
PMID 36684736
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Root systems are an important component of plants that impact crop water-use efficiency (WUE) and yield. This study examined the effects of root pruning on maize yield, WUE, and water uptake under pot and hydroponic conditions. The pot experiment showed that root pruning significantly decreased root/shoot ratio. Both small root pruning (cut off about 1/5 of the root system, RP1) and large root pruning (cut off about 1/3 of the root system, RP2) improved WUE and root hydraulic conductivity (Lpr) in the residual root system. Compared with that in the un-cut control, at the jointing stage, RP1 and RP2 increased Lpr by 43.9% and 31.5% under well-watered conditions and 27.4% and 19.8% under drought stress, respectively. RP1 increased grain yield by 12.9% compared with that in the control under well-watered conditions, whereas both pruning treatments did not exhibit a significant effect on yield under drought stress. The hydroponic experiment demonstrated that root pruning did not reduce leaf water potential but increased residual root hydraulic conductivity by 26.2% at 48 h after root pruning under well-watered conditions. The foregoing responses may be explained by the upregulation of plasma membrane intrinsic protein gene and increases in abscisic acid and jasmonic acid in roots. Increased auxin and salicylic acid contributed to the compensated lateral root growth. In conclusion, root pruning improved WUE in maize by root water uptake.

Citing Articles

A Multi-Omics Analysis Revealed the Diversity of the MYB Transcription Factor Family's Evolution and Drought Resistance Pathways.

Zhang F, Ma J, Liu Y, Fang J, Wei S, Xie R Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38255756 PMC: 10820167. DOI: 10.3390/life14010141.

References
1.
Tardieu F, Parent B, Simonneau T . Control of leaf growth by abscisic acid: hydraulic or non-hydraulic processes?. Plant Cell Environ. 2009; 33(4):636-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02091.x. View

2.
Barrero J, Talbot M, White R, Jacobsen J, Gubler F . Anatomical and transcriptomic studies of the coleorhiza reveal the importance of this tissue in regulating dormancy in barley. Plant Physiol. 2009; 150(2):1006-21. PMC: 2689963. DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.137901. View

3.
Figueroa-Bustos V, Palta J, Chen Y, Stefanova K, Siddique K . Wheat Cultivars With Contrasting Root System Size Responded Differently to Terminal Drought. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:1285. PMC: 7466772. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01285. View

4.
Ullah A, Manghwar H, Shaban M, Khan A, Akbar A, Ali U . Phytohormones enhanced drought tolerance in plants: a coping strategy. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018; 25(33):33103-33118. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3364-5. View

5.
Winzor D . Reappraisal of disparities between osmolality estimates by freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit methods. Biophys Chem. 2004; 107(3):317-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2003.11.010. View