» Articles » PMID: 35284312

Molecular Profiles and Circulating Tumor-DNA Detected in Chinese Early Stage Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Gland Surg
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2022 Mar 14
PMID 35284312
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: With the development of gene-sequencing technology, genome biomarkers, including Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (pIK3CA), BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1), and BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2), and immunomarkers, including the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), have become important in the selection of treatment.

Methods: Twenty patients with early stage breast cancer who underwent surgery were enrolled in this study. Tissue samples and paired postoperative peripheral blood samples were collected and subjected to the targeted-capture sequencing of 1,021 cancer-associated genes.

Results: The most frequently altered genes were tumor protein 53 (; 70%), (40%), protooncogene (35%), (30%), and cyclin-dependent kinase 12 (; 20%). Six (30%) patients presented with amplification of NGS and simultaneously were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 () of IHC. amplification and being positive were common in breast cancer patients without lymph node metastasis (5/6, 83.3%) and those in stages IA-IIA. Most of the somatic mutations clustered in the pathway, followed by the pathway. The TMB was lower than metastatic breast cancer in our cohort, and ranged from 0 to 9.6 mut/Mb (median: 1.92 mut/Mb). Interestingly, more patients had the mutation in the non-lymph node metastasis group than the lymph node metastasis group (55.6% . 9.1%; P=0.049). Similarly, more patients had the mutation in the non-lymph node metastasis group than the lymph node metastasis group (44.4% . 0%; P=0.026). Circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) was detected in 7 of the 20 patients (35%). Of these patients, 71.4% (5/7) were in stage I/II. In addition, no correlation was found between ctDNA detection and clinicopathological features or the driver gene mutations (e.g., and ). However, patients positive for ctDNA had a higher TMB than those negative for ctDNA when grouped according to the median TMB (1.92 mut/Mb; 85.7% . 38.5%; P=0.043).

Conclusions: This study described that genomic characteristics of Chinese early stage breast cancer, and the results showed that TMB was related to the detection of ctDNA in postoperative blood.

Citing Articles

Next-generation sequencing based deep learning model for prediction of HER2 status and response to HER2-targeted neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Wang J, Gao G, Tian C, Zhang J, Jiao D, Liu Z J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025; 151(2):72.

PMID: 39923208 PMC: 11807919. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-025-06105-0.


The prognostic role of circulating tumor DNA across breast cancer molecular subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guo N, Zhou Q, Zhang M, Chen X, Zeng B, Wu S J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 4(2):153-161.

PMID: 39282586 PMC: 11390625. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.04.005.


Circulating tumor DNA as prognostic markers of relapsed breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guo N, Zhou Q, Chen X, Zeng B, Wu S, Zeng H J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 4(1):63-73.

PMID: 39036387 PMC: 11256521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.003.


The ctDNA-based postoperative molecular residual disease status in different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer.

Yang Y, Zhang J, Li J, Xu L, Wang S, Zhang J Gland Surg. 2023; 11(12):1924-1935.

PMID: 36654951 PMC: 9840987. DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-634.


Cancer Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsy for Early Detection of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Duque G, Manterola C, Otzen T, Arias C, Palacios D, Mora M Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2022; 16:11795549221134831.

PMID: 36338263 PMC: 9634213. DOI: 10.1177/11795549221134831.

References
1.
Ravaioli S, Limarzi F, Tumedei M, Palleschi M, Maltoni R, Bravaccini S . Are we ready to use TMB in breast cancer clinical practice?. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020; 69(10):1943-1945. PMC: 11027700. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02682-w. View

2.
Thomas M, Kelly E, Abraham J, Kruse M . Invasive lobular breast cancer: A review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and future directions of early stage disease. Semin Oncol. 2019; 46(2):121-132. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.03.002. View

3.
Sui S, An X, Xu C, Li Z, Hua Y, Huang G . An immune cell infiltration-based immune score model predicts prognosis and chemotherapy effects in breast cancer. Theranostics. 2020; 10(26):11938-11949. PMC: 7667685. DOI: 10.7150/thno.49451. View

4.
Li S, Lai H, Liu J, Liu Y, Jin L, Li Y . Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts the Response and Prognosis in Patients With Early Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020; 4. PMC: 7450928. DOI: 10.1200/PO.19.00292. View

5.
Andre F, Ciruelos E, Juric D, Loibl S, Campone M, Mayer I . Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from SOLAR-1. Ann Oncol. 2020; 32(2):208-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.011. View