» Articles » PMID: 30206110

The Genetic Landscape and Clonal Evolution of Breast Cancer Resistance to Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant in the PALOMA-3 Trial

Overview
Journal Cancer Discov
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Sep 13
PMID 30206110
Citations 271
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

CDK4/6 inhibition with endocrine therapy is now a standard of care for advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance have been described preclinically, with limited evidence from clinical samples. We conducted paired baseline and end-of-treatment circulating tumor DNA sequencing from 195 patients in the PALOMA-3 randomized phase III trial of palbociclib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant. We show that clonal evolution occurs frequently during treatment, reflecting substantial subclonal complexity in breast cancer that has progressed after prior endocrine therapy. mutations emerged only in the palbociclib plus fulvestrant arm and in a minority of patients (6/127, 4.7%, = 0.041). New driver mutations emerged in ( = 0.00069) and after treatment in both arms, in particular Y537S ( = 0.0037). Evolution of driver gene mutations was uncommon in patients progressing early on palbociclib plus fulvestrant but common in patients progressing later on treatment. These findings inform future treatment strategies to address resistance to palbociclib plus fulvestrant. Acquired mutations from fulvestrant are a major driver of resistance to fulvestrant and palbociclib combination therapy. Y537S mutation promotes resistance to fulvestrant. Clonal evolution results in frequent acquisition of driver mutations in patients progressing late on therapy, which suggests that early and late progression have distinct mechanisms of resistance. .

Citing Articles

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibition in Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future.

Siskin M, Economides M, Wise D Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075623 PMC: 11898528. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050774.


PTEN inactivating mutations are associated with hormone receptor loss during breast cancer recurrence.

Zhan H, Antony V, Tang H, Theriot J, Liang Y, Hui P Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025; .

PMID: 40063317 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-025-07660-3.


Beyond traditional biopsies: the emerging role of ctDNA and MRD on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Sabit H, Attia M, Mohamed N, Taha P, Ahmed N, Osama S Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):271.

PMID: 40050490 PMC: 11885725. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01940-6.


Liquid biopsy: Cell-free DNA based analysis in breast cancer.

Venetis K, Cursano G, Pescia C, DErcole M, Porta F, Blanco M J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 1:100002.

PMID: 40027284 PMC: 11863823. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100002.


ctDNA-based liquid biopsy reveals wider mutational profile with therapy resistance and metastasis susceptibility signatures in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Bharde A, Nadagouda S, Dongare M, Hariramani K, Basavalingegowda M, Haldar S J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 7:100284.

PMID: 40027235 PMC: 11863978. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100284.


References
1.
Fribbens C, OLeary B, Kilburn L, Hrebien S, Garcia-Murillas I, Beaney M . Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(25):2961-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3061. View

2.
Roth A, Khattra J, Yap D, Wan A, Laks E, Biele J . PyClone: statistical inference of clonal population structure in cancer. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(4):396-8. PMC: 4864026. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2883. View

3.
Andor N, Graham T, Jansen M, Xia L, Aktipis C, Petritsch C . Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity. Nat Med. 2015; 22(1):105-13. PMC: 4830693. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3984. View

4.
Toy W, Shen Y, Won H, Green B, Sakr R, Will M . ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2013; 45(12):1439-45. PMC: 3903423. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2822. View

5.
Talevich E, Shain A, Botton T, Bastian B . CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016; 12(4):e1004873. PMC: 4839673. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004873. View