» Articles » PMID: 35284033

Mechanical Characterization and Validation of the Dynamic Collimation System Prototype for Proton Radiotherapy

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Radiation therapy is integral to cancer treatments for more than half of patients. Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy is the latest radiation therapy technology that uses a beam of protons that are magnetically steered and delivered to the tumor. One of the limiting factors of PBS accuracy is the beam cross-sectional size, similar to how a painter is only as accurate as the size of their brush allows. To address this, collimators can be used to shape the beam along the tumor edge to minimize the dose spread outside of the tumor. Under development is a dynamic collimation system (DCS) that uses two pairs of nickel trimmers that collimate the beam at the tumor periphery, limiting dose from spilling into healthy tissue. Herein, we establish the dosimetric and mechanical acceptance criteria for the DCS based on a functioning prototype and Monte Carlo methods, characterize the mechanical accuracy of the prototype, and validate that the acceptance criteria are met. From Monte Carlo simulations, we found that the trimmers must be positioned within ±0.5 mm and ±1.0 deg for the dose distributions to pass our gamma analysis. We characterized the trimmer positioners at jerk values up to 400 m/s and validated their accuracy to 50 m. We measured and validated the rotational trimmer accuracy to ±0.5 deg with a FARO ScanArm. Lastly, we calculated time penalties associated with the DCS and found that the additional time required to treat one field using the DCS varied from 25-52 s.

Citing Articles

Integration and dosimetric validation of a dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Nelson N, Culberson W, Hyer D, Geoghegan T, Patwardhan K, Smith B Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2023; 9(6).

PMID: 37832529 PMC: 11128250. DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad02ff.


Design, testing and characterization of a proton central axis alignment device for the dynamic collimation system.

Geoghegan T, Patwardhan K, Ying Q, Nelson N, Yu J, Gutierrez A Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2023; 9(4).

PMID: 37267924 PMC: 10330655. DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/acdad5.

References
1.
Gelover E, Wang D, Hill P, Flynn R, Gao M, Laub S . A method for modeling laterally asymmetric proton beamlets resulting from collimation. Med Phys. 2015; 42(3):1321-34. PMC: 5360162. DOI: 10.1118/1.4907965. View

2.
Arjomandy B, Sahoo N, Zhu X, Zullo J, Wu R, Zhu M . An overview of the comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance procedures implemented at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Proton Therapy Center-Houston. Med Phys. 2009; 36(6):2269-82. DOI: 10.1118/1.3120288. View

3.
Moignier A, Gelover E, Wang D, Smith B, Flynn R, Kirk M . Improving Head and Neck Cancer Treatments Using Dynamic Collimation in Spot Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Part Ther. 2019; 2(4):544-554. PMC: 6871640. DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-15-00026.1. View

4.
Perl J, Shin J, Schumann J, Faddegon B, Paganetti H . TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications. Med Phys. 2012; 39(11):6818-37. PMC: 3493036. DOI: 10.1118/1.4758060. View

5.
Lomax A . Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 1999; 44(1):185-205. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/1/014. View